Post 127,
That reviewer is one of the typical WASPy people who, thanks to their ingrained anti-semitism, like to blame everything on Jews - including the dangerous ideas generated by Christianity and Eurocentrists. There are many such people who are members of amazon and start seeing every event and every bad idea as somehow the fault of the Jews. They like to trace everything back to the Jews, because it makes themselves feel innocent and their ideologies less to blame for their actions.
There is something we need to be aware of. In the Old Testament, the mentions of Japhetic, Hamitic and Semitic were merely the ways in which the Hebrew-speaking population tried to explain the differences in their world: 'why are there people darker than ourselves? Maybe they were cursed'
The Jewish people might have had severe quarrels or competition with a neighbouring African tribe at one time and wrongly associated dark skin with something negative. Or else they could have tried to justify the conquest of neighbouring lands and ensuing slavery by arguing that any darker people they had conquered were born into slavery because of Ham. It would have served the purpose for a set time and set place and meant no more. (In Christianity this became a central doctrine, instead of a footnote on the side.)
The Christos from Europe, however, taking Christianity as the final word on all matters and taking the OT literally, used this to subjugate, enslave and destroy entire populations. The Hamitic-Semitic-Japhetic trichotomy thus went from a narrow area of effect (the Jewish people from long ago were only ever really intimate with their own surroundings and the peoples they encountered there) to being applied on a world-wide scale.
Jews are not at the centre of every plot against the rest of mankind (or any verifiable plot AFAIK), however much Christos love to project them as such.
Though the Pentateuch (Jewish religious literature) advocates harsh measures against 'goys', these were merely written by angry and jealous scribes shaking their fists against more prosperous neighbouring Egypt, Greece and other nations. They wanted to instill a sense of superiority in their people for the comparably bad situation they were going through at the time. More along the lines of: 'One day we'll be at the top and we'll see who laughs at whom then'. The reasons for their enmity have long since vanished. Ancient Greece and Egypt are no more, other peoples mentioned in the Bible no longer exist. 'Goy' merely means non-Jewish today and serves as a rule to prevent marriages out of the faith.
Today, only Orthodox Jews (and possibly not all of them) take their scripture literally - any number among them that might be harbouring plans to take over the world pale into insignificance compared to the very real and very influential ChristoIslamic plans to do the same.
The concept of 'Chosen People', too, only gained its significance on a global level after Christianity. Before that, even Jewish people believed their God was the deity of their tribe of Jews (a local deity for one particular ethnic or religious community: the Jews - hence the talk of their covenant), and eventually that he was only one among many - the others were considered false gods. They were the 'Chosen People' of <i>their</i> deity, a local phenomenon. A cursory glance through the OT (I think Deuteronomy) should make this clear.
The creators of the early mainstream Christian sects, however, had plans for all of the known world. Theirs was to be a 'catholic' religion (catholic literally means 'universal') or it would serve no purpose - they had no need for a tribal deity that only had a covenant with people who followed his laws. Christos mixed up the world saviour of the Persians with the messiah of the Jews (who was to free Jews from Roman oppression) to create jesus and his god: the world saving-messiah and his 'catholic' deity, the one true gawd.
Once again, as an accidental side-affect, Christians turned the 'Chosen people of local, tribal God of followers of Judaism' into 'Chosen People of universal gawd'. Then, yet again, throughout history, Christians would resent Jews for a concept that Christianity itself had created.
The reviewer you cited is utterly unreliable. His typically Christo-influenced, nazi-inspired anti-semitic vitriol is mere wishful thinking, as he's hoping and trying to shift the blame from what his stupid ideologies have caused to the usual scapegoat of the Christo-racists.
And as the reviewer himself states, the authors of the book he is 'reviewing' made no such connection between racism and Jews themselves. Not because they 'dared not to' in this PC world, but probably because they are not bigots unlike the reviewer himself.
Actually, all of the troubles that WASPYs like to attribute to 'the Jews' can be traced back directly to Christoism and its twisting of Judaic beliefs and scripture. Judaism never knew it was going to be a world religion - it was a mere accident of history that some people invented Christianity; and because the OT was based on the Pentateuch, it immediately brought Judaism into the limelight (through no real intention of Christianity). Because Judaism itself is the proof of Christoism's lie, Christoism hated Judaism since the beginning and blamed it for everything + more since then.
These WASPYs believe that the Jews are 'degenerating' 'White Christo Oryan culture' and destroying the 'White Christo Oryan race and civilisation'. It's the same arguments the Christo nazis and Hitler always made. So the real racists are obvious.
Unless we want to become ChristoIslamics ourselves, we should not be towing their line (indirectly) by referring to Christo-influenced anti-semites. There are serious conspiracies afoot. But they are ChristoIslamic ones, not Jewish ones.
Racist Christos (like that reviewer) are the last people we should rely on for factual information. They're after all the ones who've lied to the entire world by inventing IEs and the AIT.
That reviewer is one of the typical WASPy people who, thanks to their ingrained anti-semitism, like to blame everything on Jews - including the dangerous ideas generated by Christianity and Eurocentrists. There are many such people who are members of amazon and start seeing every event and every bad idea as somehow the fault of the Jews. They like to trace everything back to the Jews, because it makes themselves feel innocent and their ideologies less to blame for their actions.
There is something we need to be aware of. In the Old Testament, the mentions of Japhetic, Hamitic and Semitic were merely the ways in which the Hebrew-speaking population tried to explain the differences in their world: 'why are there people darker than ourselves? Maybe they were cursed'
The Jewish people might have had severe quarrels or competition with a neighbouring African tribe at one time and wrongly associated dark skin with something negative. Or else they could have tried to justify the conquest of neighbouring lands and ensuing slavery by arguing that any darker people they had conquered were born into slavery because of Ham. It would have served the purpose for a set time and set place and meant no more. (In Christianity this became a central doctrine, instead of a footnote on the side.)
The Christos from Europe, however, taking Christianity as the final word on all matters and taking the OT literally, used this to subjugate, enslave and destroy entire populations. The Hamitic-Semitic-Japhetic trichotomy thus went from a narrow area of effect (the Jewish people from long ago were only ever really intimate with their own surroundings and the peoples they encountered there) to being applied on a world-wide scale.
Jews are not at the centre of every plot against the rest of mankind (or any verifiable plot AFAIK), however much Christos love to project them as such.
Though the Pentateuch (Jewish religious literature) advocates harsh measures against 'goys', these were merely written by angry and jealous scribes shaking their fists against more prosperous neighbouring Egypt, Greece and other nations. They wanted to instill a sense of superiority in their people for the comparably bad situation they were going through at the time. More along the lines of: 'One day we'll be at the top and we'll see who laughs at whom then'. The reasons for their enmity have long since vanished. Ancient Greece and Egypt are no more, other peoples mentioned in the Bible no longer exist. 'Goy' merely means non-Jewish today and serves as a rule to prevent marriages out of the faith.
Today, only Orthodox Jews (and possibly not all of them) take their scripture literally - any number among them that might be harbouring plans to take over the world pale into insignificance compared to the very real and very influential ChristoIslamic plans to do the same.
The concept of 'Chosen People', too, only gained its significance on a global level after Christianity. Before that, even Jewish people believed their God was the deity of their tribe of Jews (a local deity for one particular ethnic or religious community: the Jews - hence the talk of their covenant), and eventually that he was only one among many - the others were considered false gods. They were the 'Chosen People' of <i>their</i> deity, a local phenomenon. A cursory glance through the OT (I think Deuteronomy) should make this clear.
The creators of the early mainstream Christian sects, however, had plans for all of the known world. Theirs was to be a 'catholic' religion (catholic literally means 'universal') or it would serve no purpose - they had no need for a tribal deity that only had a covenant with people who followed his laws. Christos mixed up the world saviour of the Persians with the messiah of the Jews (who was to free Jews from Roman oppression) to create jesus and his god: the world saving-messiah and his 'catholic' deity, the one true gawd.
Once again, as an accidental side-affect, Christians turned the 'Chosen people of local, tribal God of followers of Judaism' into 'Chosen People of universal gawd'. Then, yet again, throughout history, Christians would resent Jews for a concept that Christianity itself had created.
The reviewer you cited is utterly unreliable. His typically Christo-influenced, nazi-inspired anti-semitic vitriol is mere wishful thinking, as he's hoping and trying to shift the blame from what his stupid ideologies have caused to the usual scapegoat of the Christo-racists.
And as the reviewer himself states, the authors of the book he is 'reviewing' made no such connection between racism and Jews themselves. Not because they 'dared not to' in this PC world, but probably because they are not bigots unlike the reviewer himself.
Actually, all of the troubles that WASPYs like to attribute to 'the Jews' can be traced back directly to Christoism and its twisting of Judaic beliefs and scripture. Judaism never knew it was going to be a world religion - it was a mere accident of history that some people invented Christianity; and because the OT was based on the Pentateuch, it immediately brought Judaism into the limelight (through no real intention of Christianity). Because Judaism itself is the proof of Christoism's lie, Christoism hated Judaism since the beginning and blamed it for everything + more since then.
These WASPYs believe that the Jews are 'degenerating' 'White Christo Oryan culture' and destroying the 'White Christo Oryan race and civilisation'. It's the same arguments the Christo nazis and Hitler always made. So the real racists are obvious.
Unless we want to become ChristoIslamics ourselves, we should not be towing their line (indirectly) by referring to Christo-influenced anti-semites. There are serious conspiracies afoot. But they are ChristoIslamic ones, not Jewish ones.
Racist Christos (like that reviewer) are the last people we should rely on for factual information. They're after all the ones who've lied to the entire world by inventing IEs and the AIT.