Post 62 (maruti):
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Even Husky has admitted that sikh and neo-buddhist and in some cases, jains are spreading malicious propaganda against hindus. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->I admitted no such thing. I have repeatedly written that I doubted the people were Jains. I also wrote that the modern anti-Hindu Buddhist movements are not Buddhist (underscored by the fact that these 'Buddhist' sites write more about the hatred they bear Hinduism than revealing any understanding of Buddhism).
This is what I stated, so don't put words in my mouth:
http://www.india-forum.com/forums/index.ph...indpost&p=59841
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Some Jain writers deny that Jainism has any relation to Hindu Dharma and strangely argue for the p-sec view (maybe they are not Jains). <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->And in http://www.india-forum.com/forums/index.ph...indpost&p=59931
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->There are most definitely some Sikhs and Indian Buddhists and possibly (?) Jains who knock Hinduism. (There was a site where a 'Jain' was writing about how Hindus were communalist and only trying to unify with Jains so as to fight ChristoIslamism. The writer made at least 4 mistakes about Jainism and I got suspicious. Turns out the site was a Christian propaganda site.)<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> http://www.india-forum.com/forums/index.ph...indpost&p=59841
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->the anti-Hindu Buddhist movements in India today (although the modern Buddhist movements in India are not Buddhist at all<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Later on in the same post I used it in the same context, when writing "Modern Indian Buddhism (neo-Buddhism) is often completely anti-Hindu."
You need to appreciate that any one may pretend to be 'Jain',... when arguing anonymously on-line. That is why I rely more on my personal experience than on unlikely and suspicious characters conveniently gathered together at propaganda sites.
As for the Sikh characters and sites I've come across who were anti-Hindu - I merely assumed they were Khalistanis (or their desperate attempts to seem more like mainstream Sikhism). In such situations too, I must allow I may have been misled as to who the real writers were in each case.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Even Husky has admitted that sikh and neo-buddhist and in some cases, jains are spreading malicious propaganda against hindus. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->I admitted no such thing. I have repeatedly written that I doubted the people were Jains. I also wrote that the modern anti-Hindu Buddhist movements are not Buddhist (underscored by the fact that these 'Buddhist' sites write more about the hatred they bear Hinduism than revealing any understanding of Buddhism).
This is what I stated, so don't put words in my mouth:
http://www.india-forum.com/forums/index.ph...indpost&p=59841
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Some Jain writers deny that Jainism has any relation to Hindu Dharma and strangely argue for the p-sec view (maybe they are not Jains). <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->And in http://www.india-forum.com/forums/index.ph...indpost&p=59931
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->There are most definitely some Sikhs and Indian Buddhists and possibly (?) Jains who knock Hinduism. (There was a site where a 'Jain' was writing about how Hindus were communalist and only trying to unify with Jains so as to fight ChristoIslamism. The writer made at least 4 mistakes about Jainism and I got suspicious. Turns out the site was a Christian propaganda site.)<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> http://www.india-forum.com/forums/index.ph...indpost&p=59841
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->the anti-Hindu Buddhist movements in India today (although the modern Buddhist movements in India are not Buddhist at all<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Later on in the same post I used it in the same context, when writing "Modern Indian Buddhism (neo-Buddhism) is often completely anti-Hindu."
You need to appreciate that any one may pretend to be 'Jain',... when arguing anonymously on-line. That is why I rely more on my personal experience than on unlikely and suspicious characters conveniently gathered together at propaganda sites.
As for the Sikh characters and sites I've come across who were anti-Hindu - I merely assumed they were Khalistanis (or their desperate attempts to seem more like mainstream Sikhism). In such situations too, I must allow I may have been misled as to who the real writers were in each case.