11-03-2006, 12:46 AM
Huskyji
Very quickly while that may be true in what christos do, AIT is through and through bible - it originated in bible and has always followed what the current theological debates. Theologicians spent hours and hours pondering over what was the adamite language and the tower of babel and which of today's language was the closest to the ursprache.
Jones, Muller, Dubois, Leibniz - all they did was work within this framework. The debates were -> yindoos are japhetic or hametic ? Mullers whole argument was due to language yindoos lost the monotheistic concept (due to dynamism/creativity/etc) while jews being desert dwellers didnt have much to do and werent that creative in any way so they were able to hold on to the original monotheism.
More later..
Very quickly while that may be true in what christos do, AIT is through and through bible - it originated in bible and has always followed what the current theological debates. Theologicians spent hours and hours pondering over what was the adamite language and the tower of babel and which of today's language was the closest to the ursprache.
Jones, Muller, Dubois, Leibniz - all they did was work within this framework. The debates were -> yindoos are japhetic or hametic ? Mullers whole argument was due to language yindoos lost the monotheistic concept (due to dynamism/creativity/etc) while jews being desert dwellers didnt have much to do and werent that creative in any way so they were able to hold on to the original monotheism.
More later..