11-21-2006, 03:05 AM
<!--emo&:argue--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/argue.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='argue.gif' /><!--endemo--> Saddam trial flawed: Human Rights Watch
Monday, November 20, 2006
Source: PTI
Image Source: AFP
Blog this story
New York: Terming the trial of ousted Iraqi President Saddam Hussein as flawed, a US-based human rights groups has accused the Iraqi government of influencing the judges.
Hussein was sentenced to death on November five after being convicted for crimes against humanity.
The trial by the Iraqi High Tribunal was marred by so many procedural and substantive flaws that imposition of death penalty was indefensible, the Human Rights Watch said, adding that the verdict was "unsound."
"The proceedings in the Dujail trial were fundamentally unfair," <span style='font-size:21pt;line-height:100%'>Nehal Bhuta </span>of the International Justice programme at Human Rights Watch and author of the 97-page report released today said.
"The tribunal squandered an important opportunity to deliver credible justice to the people of Iraq."
"The Iraqi High Tribunal was undermined from the outset by Iraqi government actions that threatened the independence and perceived impartiality of the court. Members of Parliament and even ministers regularly denounced the tribunal as weak, leading to the resignation of the first presiding trial judge," it noted.
The shortcomings of the trial, for the killings of more than 100 people from the Iraqi town of Dujail, also call into question subsequent proceedings at the tribunal, the report said.
Monday, November 20, 2006
Source: PTI
Image Source: AFP
Blog this story
New York: Terming the trial of ousted Iraqi President Saddam Hussein as flawed, a US-based human rights groups has accused the Iraqi government of influencing the judges.
Hussein was sentenced to death on November five after being convicted for crimes against humanity.
The trial by the Iraqi High Tribunal was marred by so many procedural and substantive flaws that imposition of death penalty was indefensible, the Human Rights Watch said, adding that the verdict was "unsound."
"The proceedings in the Dujail trial were fundamentally unfair," <span style='font-size:21pt;line-height:100%'>Nehal Bhuta </span>of the International Justice programme at Human Rights Watch and author of the 97-page report released today said.
"The tribunal squandered an important opportunity to deliver credible justice to the people of Iraq."
"The Iraqi High Tribunal was undermined from the outset by Iraqi government actions that threatened the independence and perceived impartiality of the court. Members of Parliament and even ministers regularly denounced the tribunal as weak, leading to the resignation of the first presiding trial judge," it noted.
The shortcomings of the trial, for the killings of more than 100 people from the Iraqi town of Dujail, also call into question subsequent proceedings at the tribunal, the report said.