12-06-2006, 08:42 PM
The man behind the deal
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<b>Philip Zelikow </b>may go down in history for a statement he made at a press briefing where he was described only as âState Department Official Number Oneâ. It was at this March 2005 meeting that he declared the US had set itself a foreign policy goal of helping âIndia become a major world power in the 21st centuryâ.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->In New Delhi he should be known as one of the fathers of the Indo-US civilian nuclear cooperation agreement.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--><!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->As Tellis, now at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, later explained, âI told Zelikow that the US had three choices when it came to the India relationship: do nothing; keep the relationship where it was; or go for something big.â
The relationship was at a crossroads. Zelikow recommended to Rice that the US go for the third option. In other words, the US should throw its diplomatic might into persuading the world to modify the non-proliferation regime. He had chosen the road never travelled before and that made all the difference.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<b>Philip Zelikow </b>may go down in history for a statement he made at a press briefing where he was described only as âState Department Official Number Oneâ. It was at this March 2005 meeting that he declared the US had set itself a foreign policy goal of helping âIndia become a major world power in the 21st centuryâ.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->In New Delhi he should be known as one of the fathers of the Indo-US civilian nuclear cooperation agreement.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--><!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->As Tellis, now at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, later explained, âI told Zelikow that the US had three choices when it came to the India relationship: do nothing; keep the relationship where it was; or go for something big.â
The relationship was at a crossroads. Zelikow recommended to Rice that the US go for the third option. In other words, the US should throw its diplomatic might into persuading the world to modify the non-proliferation regime. He had chosen the road never travelled before and that made all the difference.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->