12-08-2006, 05:01 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-digvijay+Dec 8 2006, 02:50 PM-->QUOTE(digvijay @ Dec 8 2006, 02:50 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin-kartiksri+--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(kartiksri)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Kartik: I may be wrong about the Shahi being Brahmin example. I just read that Hindu Shahis belonged to two dynasties, the first one being Brahmin, the second one Janjua Rajput which started with Jayapala. But I remember reading in some Mohyal site of Jayapala also being Brahmin. If somebody can provide input on the same please do.
[right][snapback]61818[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
This is wrong. Brhamins and rajputs have no connection.
-Digvijay
[right][snapback]61830[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Please see www.mohyal.com, the history of Vaids and tell me why you are so sure. They claim even Porus was a Mohyal. Mohyals are Brahmins.
[right][snapback]61818[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
This is wrong. Brhamins and rajputs have no connection.
-Digvijay
[right][snapback]61830[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Please see www.mohyal.com, the history of Vaids and tell me why you are so sure. They claim even Porus was a Mohyal. Mohyals are Brahmins.