12-20-2006, 03:56 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-dhu+Dec 19 2006, 09:30 PM-->QUOTE(dhu @ Dec 19 2006, 09:30 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->R2 is only found in Asia. this firmly anchors the entire R clan in Asia (aka India). J is from Baluchistan, glossed over as Eastern Iran (Quintana-Murci). J2 skirted the hittite, kurdish hinterlands, while J1 proceeded into the arabian and levantian interior. the hg3 and hg 9 statement :
<i>
âIf we were to use the same arithmetic and logic (sensu haplography 9 is Neolithic) to give an interpretation of this table, (Table 17.3), the straightforward suggestion would be that both (Neolithic) agricultural and Indo-European languages arose in India and from there, spread to Europe (emphasis in the original)â.</i>
There is no derivative V from HV in india. oppenheimer uses this fact (among others) to locate the HV locus in kashmir. it is becoming clearer that paleo euros (U6) were largely replaced by neolithics originating from pretty much the same locations as the original euro paleo settlers. indian populationss by contrast display a unique continuity since the initial southern route seedings. the first migrtions into europe were much more intrusive and foundational since they were into virgin territory. impacts of later migrations were blunted by what was already there. the last migrant gypsies could not convert the entire euro populations due to entrenched settlement patterns. we are taking of a migration of only a few thousand in these settling gypsy clans.
[right][snapback]62270[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You should find the site who show that europeans are more similar whit arabs,not whit indians.This gona be the main proove that was no aryan invasion.
<i>
âIf we were to use the same arithmetic and logic (sensu haplography 9 is Neolithic) to give an interpretation of this table, (Table 17.3), the straightforward suggestion would be that both (Neolithic) agricultural and Indo-European languages arose in India and from there, spread to Europe (emphasis in the original)â.</i>
There is no derivative V from HV in india. oppenheimer uses this fact (among others) to locate the HV locus in kashmir. it is becoming clearer that paleo euros (U6) were largely replaced by neolithics originating from pretty much the same locations as the original euro paleo settlers. indian populationss by contrast display a unique continuity since the initial southern route seedings. the first migrtions into europe were much more intrusive and foundational since they were into virgin territory. impacts of later migrations were blunted by what was already there. the last migrant gypsies could not convert the entire euro populations due to entrenched settlement patterns. we are taking of a migration of only a few thousand in these settling gypsy clans.
[right][snapback]62270[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You should find the site who show that europeans are more similar whit arabs,not whit indians.This gona be the main proove that was no aryan invasion.