<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Pretending that Anatolia was european only because greeks use to live there before the turks.and conected that way whit aryan theory as they didnt find any cradle of aryans in europe it self.
From all euros pre-christian religions,celtic one seem to be the most similar whit indian one,while greek religion was similar whit semitic non-abrahamic ones,and thracian-ilyrians whit hittite and egiptian ones.
A new theory show that celts came from the sea and then spread throw europe.We just ask from were they came?
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Romans also had interests in anatolia. this does not negate the fact that their predecessors along with celts pushed through anatolia (from the sea) to fuse with etruscans and basques respectively. same is also true with greeks and balkans. An IE anatolia is the last hope for keeping the Asiatic IE family within the confines of "europe". But anatolia is simply brimming with hurrian, semitic, chechen, etc. further east is the only solution
From all euros pre-christian religions,celtic one seem to be the most similar whit indian one,while greek religion was similar whit semitic non-abrahamic ones,and thracian-ilyrians whit hittite and egiptian ones.
A new theory show that celts came from the sea and then spread throw europe.We just ask from were they came?
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Romans also had interests in anatolia. this does not negate the fact that their predecessors along with celts pushed through anatolia (from the sea) to fuse with etruscans and basques respectively. same is also true with greeks and balkans. An IE anatolia is the last hope for keeping the Asiatic IE family within the confines of "europe". But anatolia is simply brimming with hurrian, semitic, chechen, etc. further east is the only solution