04-21-2004, 02:42 AM
Mr Poojary, thanks for confirming
that she sought Italian security. But..
By S. Gurumurthy
20 Apr 2004
"What is wrong with Sonia asking for Italian security cover for herself?" he asks. "She has to do it as she is on the "hit list", he says.
He is no ordinary man. No ordinary Congressman. Not just a one rupee member of the party. He is the president of the Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee. He was a Central minister too.
This is obviously in response to the investigative expose which appeared in this paper on the 17th April 2004 (Sonia Unmasked). "Just as Atal Behari Vajpayee is provided with security by the US when he visits the US", says Poojary, "so also Sonia is provided with security when she visits Italy".
Obviously Mr Poojary has not read the investigative story in full or he is pretending that the investigation talks of only Italian security providing security for Sonia. But Mr Poojary, the US police protects Vajpayee in the US at the request of the Indian Government, just like the Indian police protects the US President in India. But Sonia seeks Italian security keeping the Indian Government completely in the dark.
The investigation had exposed four different dimensions of Sonia's Italian connections. First and the most serious, Sonia had deep connections with the Italian intelligence agencies as early as the time when Indira Gandhi was the Prime Minister. She brought about liaison between Indian and Italian intelligence agencies and brought about a clandestine meeting with Italian spies in a western European city. This was when she was just a housewife! Mr Poojary, consult your leader and then answer whether she performed this highly skilled assignment. How did she, just a housewife, get into such intimacy with Italian spy agencies?
Another dimension was that obviously she had brought in her family into sensitive security areas of Indian state. Her brother-in-law, Walter Winci was involved in bullet-proofing of Indira Gandhi's car.
He was also involved in attempting to get Italians to train India's SPG, formed to protect the Prime Ministers of India! Will you ask your leader on what basis Walter Winci was chosen for this sensitive assignment? The third aspect was that Sonia was keeping the Indian establishment, including the security and foreign affairs offices, completely in the dark and has been dealing with the Italian establishment directly.
She has been arranging security for her children even Rajiv Gandhi was alive through the Italian security establishment, with the Indian security establishment totally unaware. It is important that this happened when Rajiv Gandhi was alive. Mr Poojary, is it not her lack of trust and confidence in the Indian security and establishment headed by her own husband?
The next point was that after Rajiv Gandhi's death she did the same thing. She asked the Italian embassy to arrange for their security. The Swiss police official humiliated the Indian security establishment saying that the wife of the (ex) Prime Minister of India did not have faith in the Indian security and she is only looking to Italians for her security. This is a national humiliation, Mr Poojary. Will you ask your leader to respond? But you have not gone to the extent of saying that since the Indian security has not protected her mother-in-law and her husband, she, as a mother, was right in seeking the Italian security for her children. Despite all this Mr Poojary, you have been honest enough to confirm that yes she did seek Italian security for herself, meaning her children. But what about her connections with the Italian spies? Her inducting her family in sensitive areas of Indian security?
Writer's email comment@gurumurthy.net
www.newindpress.com/elect...-96&Cat=K&
that she sought Italian security. But..
By S. Gurumurthy
20 Apr 2004
"What is wrong with Sonia asking for Italian security cover for herself?" he asks. "She has to do it as she is on the "hit list", he says.
He is no ordinary man. No ordinary Congressman. Not just a one rupee member of the party. He is the president of the Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee. He was a Central minister too.
This is obviously in response to the investigative expose which appeared in this paper on the 17th April 2004 (Sonia Unmasked). "Just as Atal Behari Vajpayee is provided with security by the US when he visits the US", says Poojary, "so also Sonia is provided with security when she visits Italy".
Obviously Mr Poojary has not read the investigative story in full or he is pretending that the investigation talks of only Italian security providing security for Sonia. But Mr Poojary, the US police protects Vajpayee in the US at the request of the Indian Government, just like the Indian police protects the US President in India. But Sonia seeks Italian security keeping the Indian Government completely in the dark.
The investigation had exposed four different dimensions of Sonia's Italian connections. First and the most serious, Sonia had deep connections with the Italian intelligence agencies as early as the time when Indira Gandhi was the Prime Minister. She brought about liaison between Indian and Italian intelligence agencies and brought about a clandestine meeting with Italian spies in a western European city. This was when she was just a housewife! Mr Poojary, consult your leader and then answer whether she performed this highly skilled assignment. How did she, just a housewife, get into such intimacy with Italian spy agencies?
Another dimension was that obviously she had brought in her family into sensitive security areas of Indian state. Her brother-in-law, Walter Winci was involved in bullet-proofing of Indira Gandhi's car.
He was also involved in attempting to get Italians to train India's SPG, formed to protect the Prime Ministers of India! Will you ask your leader on what basis Walter Winci was chosen for this sensitive assignment? The third aspect was that Sonia was keeping the Indian establishment, including the security and foreign affairs offices, completely in the dark and has been dealing with the Italian establishment directly.
She has been arranging security for her children even Rajiv Gandhi was alive through the Italian security establishment, with the Indian security establishment totally unaware. It is important that this happened when Rajiv Gandhi was alive. Mr Poojary, is it not her lack of trust and confidence in the Indian security and establishment headed by her own husband?
The next point was that after Rajiv Gandhi's death she did the same thing. She asked the Italian embassy to arrange for their security. The Swiss police official humiliated the Indian security establishment saying that the wife of the (ex) Prime Minister of India did not have faith in the Indian security and she is only looking to Italians for her security. This is a national humiliation, Mr Poojary. Will you ask your leader to respond? But you have not gone to the extent of saying that since the Indian security has not protected her mother-in-law and her husband, she, as a mother, was right in seeking the Italian security for her children. Despite all this Mr Poojary, you have been honest enough to confirm that yes she did seek Italian security for herself, meaning her children. But what about her connections with the Italian spies? Her inducting her family in sensitive areas of Indian security?
Writer's email comment@gurumurthy.net
www.newindpress.com/elect...-96&Cat=K&