<!--QuoteBegin-Husky+Jan 29 2007, 05:53 AM-->QUOTE(Husky @ Jan 29 2007, 05:53 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Post 192 (dhu):
Obviously, your understanding far exceeds mine. Heck, you can distill ideas in a few sentences that would take me chapters of reading to understand. Afraid that #192 is such a case: requires re-reading on my part and lots of time to turn it around in my mind.
[right][snapback]63706[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
husky, my understanding is limited to leeching off of others. probably we will have to wait for the next generation of vivekananda to come forth to piece it all together. the key I would think lies in the origins of roman jurispudence. If jewish and Romans shared one thing, then that would have to be the entity called "the Law". currently, the dominant paradigm of a "Middle eastern prelude to the european miracle" states that roman jurispudence was just a continuation of hammurabi.
right now i am leaning towards the uncomfortable fact that the entire phenomenon of semitism (in s. europe and the levant) was simply a cough reflex to expel the indic imports (initailly IE, then Zoroastrian, and finally buddhist)... a test case would be to see if panchatantra became normatized into aesops upon entry into europe..
Obviously, your understanding far exceeds mine. Heck, you can distill ideas in a few sentences that would take me chapters of reading to understand. Afraid that #192 is such a case: requires re-reading on my part and lots of time to turn it around in my mind.
[right][snapback]63706[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
husky, my understanding is limited to leeching off of others. probably we will have to wait for the next generation of vivekananda to come forth to piece it all together. the key I would think lies in the origins of roman jurispudence. If jewish and Romans shared one thing, then that would have to be the entity called "the Law". currently, the dominant paradigm of a "Middle eastern prelude to the european miracle" states that roman jurispudence was just a continuation of hammurabi.
right now i am leaning towards the uncomfortable fact that the entire phenomenon of semitism (in s. europe and the levant) was simply a cough reflex to expel the indic imports (initailly IE, then Zoroastrian, and finally buddhist)... a test case would be to see if panchatantra became normatized into aesops upon entry into europe..