02-10-2007, 11:29 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-10-2007, 11:30 AM by Hauma Hamiddha.)
<b>"à¤à¤¬ à¤à¥à¤²à¤¾à¤§à¤¿à¤ªà¤¤à¤¿ नॠदà¥à¤à¥à¤·à¤¾à¤à¤¤ समारà¥à¤¹ à¤à¥ पà¥à¤°à¤¾à¤°à¤®à¥à¤ मà¥à¤ मà¤à¤à¤²à¤¾à¤à¤°à¤£ à¤à¥ à¤à¤¾à¤°à¥à¤¯à¤à¥à¤°à¤® à¤à¥ हॠहà¤à¤µà¤¾ दिया। यहाठà¤à¥ परमà¥à¤ªà¤°à¤¾ रहॠहॠà¤à¤¿ हर à¤à¥à¤à¥-बड़ॠà¤à¤¾à¤°à¥à¤¯à¤à¥à¤°à¤® à¤à¥ शà¥à¤°à¥à¤à¤¤ वà¥à¤¦à¤¿à¤ व पà¥à¤°à¤¾à¤£à¤¿à¤ मà¤à¤à¤²à¤¾à¤à¤°à¤£ सॠहà¥à¤¤à¥ हà¥à¥¤ "
</b>
This is a clear attack on the Hindu ethos itself. But in sense I think it lends truth the belief the veda recoils and keeps away from the dasyu-s like Rajeswar. ma~NgalAcharaNaM cannot be recited before such characters.
</b>
This is a clear attack on the Hindu ethos itself. But in sense I think it lends truth the belief the veda recoils and keeps away from the dasyu-s like Rajeswar. ma~NgalAcharaNaM cannot be recited before such characters.