Onwards psecular undercover Christo soldiers/infiltrators!
First Sachin Tendulkar was blasted by the media for 'superstition' (in other words, for his Hinduism), now it's the turn of Aishwarya. And it's not just the media this time, it's a lawsuit slapped on her by some woman conditioned by christoislamicommunism.
http://masalaspice.com/2007/02/03/case-fil...s-tree-wedding/
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Case filed against Ashâs tree wedding</b>
(See photo on page: Aish looking beautiful, as always)
Patna: A public interest litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Patna High Court against Bollywood star Aishwarya Rai for marrying trees to overcome astrological differences with her fiancé Abhishek Bachchan.
<b>Lawyer Shruti Singh, who filed the PIL earlier this week, says the ritual promotes untouchability.</b>
(She is joking right, because I can't believe anyone could really be this stupid.)
âI filed a PIL to stop such practices as reportedly conducted by actor Amitabh Bachchan for his future daughter-in-law Aishwarya Rai.<b> It is in violation of Article 17 of the Constitution, which prohibits untouchability. It also violates fundamental human rights,â said Shruti.</b>Â <!--emo&:blink:--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='blink.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Aishwarya is a Manglik (astrologically Mars-bearing), which is believed to have negative consequences for her impending marriage. The actress is said to have married a peepal tree at Benaras, a banana tree at a Bangalore temple and a godâs idol in Ayodhya.
<b>According to Shruti, the fact that Aishwarya had to marry the trees and the idol before marrying Abhishek, who is a non-Manglik, amounts to untouchability.</b>
âThe rituals performed by Aishwarya, Amitabh and Abhishek would only promote superstitions and blind faith among common people,â Shruti, who is also a womenâs rights activist, said.
(She doesn't speak for any woman I know. Aishwarya wants and is excercising the <i>rights of any human</i>: to be allowed to marry a tree or a Vishnu vigraham, when it does not hurt anyone else. SS ought to stop impinging on Aishwarya's and Hindus rights to do what we wish.
And it has NOTHING to do with untouchability - what the heck is that accusation about?)
Her PIL requests the court to issue a directive to the state government and the Bihar State Religious Trust Board (BSRTB) to stop the practice of marrying a Manglik-born bride first with a tree, god or animal prior to her marrying a non- Manglik man.
(Lawyer SS of the fascist, psecular, anti-Hindu brigade is essentially saying: "Stop Hindoos and their temples from performing private Hindoo functions. Though I don't visit any temples, I can't abide by the fact that some Hindoo somewhere is happy or okay with doing Hindoo things in their Hindoo temples. How dare they, it makes me fume! Curtail their rights, because their business and their happiness is causing me anguish.")
<b>She has sought a ban on the performance of such marriages at temples in Bihar including Shitla temple in Patna, Baikatpur temple near Fatuha and the Shiva temple at Deoghar.</b>
The activist has also <b>demanded a public apology</b> from the Bachchan family for asking Aishwarya to enter into such false marriages.
â<b>An FIR should be filed </b>against Bachchan, his wife Jaya and Samajwadi Party leader Amar Singh for encouraging such practices,â Shruti said. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
What about the exorcisms and speaking in tongues, lying on the ground and doing spastic movements that are performed in pentecostal churches, then? Sue all of them, instead. And those churches are actually <i>promoting</i> (real) superstition by going around missionizing - spreading Jeebus' speaking-in-tongues Word and all.
Ooh, look. That fake 'Hindu' organisation has sought out the occasion to make a timely reapparance. Drat. Just when I thought they had already imploded because of their self-conceit:
http://masalaspice.com/2007/02/03/case-fil...s-tree-wedding/
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>US Hindu reform group condemns rituals by Bachchan</b>
From correspondents in Americas, 05:01 PM IST
A US-based international Hindu reform organisation has expressed disapproval of the ritualistic ceremonies performed by Bollywood superstar Amitabh Bachchan for his son Abhishek and fiance Aishwarya Rai.
Aishwarya is a Manglik (astrologically Mars-bearing), which is believed to have negative consequences for her impending marriage. The actress is said to have married a peepal tree at Benaras, a banana tree at a Bangalore temple and a god's idol in Ayodhya.
The organisation Navya Shastra commends the Bachchans for their Hindu religiosity and charitable works but is extremely concerned about their actions, which will have an unhealthy impact on their fan base.
Before announcing their engagement, Abhishek and Aishwarya performed a series of poojas (offerings) at the Kashi Vishwanath temple and the Sankat Mochan temple in Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh. After their engagement, the couple also sought the blessings of the deity at the Vindhyavasini Temple.
'What concerns us is that millions of people may rationalise their mistreatment of women based upon the Abhishek-Aishwarya example,' said Jaishree Gopal, <b>Navya Shastra</b> Chairman, in a press statement.
'As it is, hundreds of thousands of women, and even some men, have difficulty marrying because of the alleged perniciousness of a random confluence of stars,' added Gopal.
The organisation opines that astrology and similar unscientific practices should be renounced in marital matchmaking and other everyday activities in Hindu society.
It claims that much of the so-called Hindu astrology is an imported amalgamation of long-invalidated pseudo-sciences emerging from Babylon, Greece and Persia, and should be discarded as irrelevant to Hindu tradition.
Noting that the religious rationale for untouchability is also based upon an accidental birth, Navya Shastra urges the Bachchans and Aishwarya to renounce such actions.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
(1) Hindu astrology is not imported, but developed in India. Persia did import demonology from Babylon, but India is not Persia.
(2) Again: nothing to do with 'untouchability'. What is going on in these loonies' minds? The rituals Aish took part in have to do with Hindu astrology (to do with time and location and alignment of heavenly bodies during birth).
Taking just these two points into consideration, Navya Shastra is not Hindu at all and knows nothing about either Indian history (1) or Hinduism (2).
The case involving Aishwarya is merely the psecular government-fostered sentiment against Hindu celebrities doing anything Hindu that makes it into the newspapers. Gasp! Hindus might actually realise the lives of their favourite cricketplayer or actress involves Hindu activities and that might promote Hinduism. This must be prevented at all costs!
First Sachin Tendulkar was blasted by the media for 'superstition' (in other words, for his Hinduism), now it's the turn of Aishwarya. And it's not just the media this time, it's a lawsuit slapped on her by some woman conditioned by christoislamicommunism.
http://masalaspice.com/2007/02/03/case-fil...s-tree-wedding/
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Case filed against Ashâs tree wedding</b>
(See photo on page: Aish looking beautiful, as always)
Patna: A public interest litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Patna High Court against Bollywood star Aishwarya Rai for marrying trees to overcome astrological differences with her fiancé Abhishek Bachchan.
<b>Lawyer Shruti Singh, who filed the PIL earlier this week, says the ritual promotes untouchability.</b>
(She is joking right, because I can't believe anyone could really be this stupid.)
âI filed a PIL to stop such practices as reportedly conducted by actor Amitabh Bachchan for his future daughter-in-law Aishwarya Rai.<b> It is in violation of Article 17 of the Constitution, which prohibits untouchability. It also violates fundamental human rights,â said Shruti.</b>Â <!--emo&:blink:--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='blink.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Aishwarya is a Manglik (astrologically Mars-bearing), which is believed to have negative consequences for her impending marriage. The actress is said to have married a peepal tree at Benaras, a banana tree at a Bangalore temple and a godâs idol in Ayodhya.
<b>According to Shruti, the fact that Aishwarya had to marry the trees and the idol before marrying Abhishek, who is a non-Manglik, amounts to untouchability.</b>
âThe rituals performed by Aishwarya, Amitabh and Abhishek would only promote superstitions and blind faith among common people,â Shruti, who is also a womenâs rights activist, said.
(She doesn't speak for any woman I know. Aishwarya wants and is excercising the <i>rights of any human</i>: to be allowed to marry a tree or a Vishnu vigraham, when it does not hurt anyone else. SS ought to stop impinging on Aishwarya's and Hindus rights to do what we wish.
And it has NOTHING to do with untouchability - what the heck is that accusation about?)
Her PIL requests the court to issue a directive to the state government and the Bihar State Religious Trust Board (BSRTB) to stop the practice of marrying a Manglik-born bride first with a tree, god or animal prior to her marrying a non- Manglik man.
(Lawyer SS of the fascist, psecular, anti-Hindu brigade is essentially saying: "Stop Hindoos and their temples from performing private Hindoo functions. Though I don't visit any temples, I can't abide by the fact that some Hindoo somewhere is happy or okay with doing Hindoo things in their Hindoo temples. How dare they, it makes me fume! Curtail their rights, because their business and their happiness is causing me anguish.")
<b>She has sought a ban on the performance of such marriages at temples in Bihar including Shitla temple in Patna, Baikatpur temple near Fatuha and the Shiva temple at Deoghar.</b>
The activist has also <b>demanded a public apology</b> from the Bachchan family for asking Aishwarya to enter into such false marriages.
â<b>An FIR should be filed </b>against Bachchan, his wife Jaya and Samajwadi Party leader Amar Singh for encouraging such practices,â Shruti said. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
What about the exorcisms and speaking in tongues, lying on the ground and doing spastic movements that are performed in pentecostal churches, then? Sue all of them, instead. And those churches are actually <i>promoting</i> (real) superstition by going around missionizing - spreading Jeebus' speaking-in-tongues Word and all.
Ooh, look. That fake 'Hindu' organisation has sought out the occasion to make a timely reapparance. Drat. Just when I thought they had already imploded because of their self-conceit:
http://masalaspice.com/2007/02/03/case-fil...s-tree-wedding/
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>US Hindu reform group condemns rituals by Bachchan</b>
From correspondents in Americas, 05:01 PM IST
A US-based international Hindu reform organisation has expressed disapproval of the ritualistic ceremonies performed by Bollywood superstar Amitabh Bachchan for his son Abhishek and fiance Aishwarya Rai.
Aishwarya is a Manglik (astrologically Mars-bearing), which is believed to have negative consequences for her impending marriage. The actress is said to have married a peepal tree at Benaras, a banana tree at a Bangalore temple and a god's idol in Ayodhya.
The organisation Navya Shastra commends the Bachchans for their Hindu religiosity and charitable works but is extremely concerned about their actions, which will have an unhealthy impact on their fan base.
Before announcing their engagement, Abhishek and Aishwarya performed a series of poojas (offerings) at the Kashi Vishwanath temple and the Sankat Mochan temple in Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh. After their engagement, the couple also sought the blessings of the deity at the Vindhyavasini Temple.
'What concerns us is that millions of people may rationalise their mistreatment of women based upon the Abhishek-Aishwarya example,' said Jaishree Gopal, <b>Navya Shastra</b> Chairman, in a press statement.
'As it is, hundreds of thousands of women, and even some men, have difficulty marrying because of the alleged perniciousness of a random confluence of stars,' added Gopal.
The organisation opines that astrology and similar unscientific practices should be renounced in marital matchmaking and other everyday activities in Hindu society.
It claims that much of the so-called Hindu astrology is an imported amalgamation of long-invalidated pseudo-sciences emerging from Babylon, Greece and Persia, and should be discarded as irrelevant to Hindu tradition.
Noting that the religious rationale for untouchability is also based upon an accidental birth, Navya Shastra urges the Bachchans and Aishwarya to renounce such actions.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
(1) Hindu astrology is not imported, but developed in India. Persia did import demonology from Babylon, but India is not Persia.
(2) Again: nothing to do with 'untouchability'. What is going on in these loonies' minds? The rituals Aish took part in have to do with Hindu astrology (to do with time and location and alignment of heavenly bodies during birth).
Taking just these two points into consideration, Navya Shastra is not Hindu at all and knows nothing about either Indian history (1) or Hinduism (2).
The case involving Aishwarya is merely the psecular government-fostered sentiment against Hindu celebrities doing anything Hindu that makes it into the newspapers. Gasp! Hindus might actually realise the lives of their favourite cricketplayer or actress involves Hindu activities and that might promote Hinduism. This must be prevented at all costs!