Communists fear for their authoritarian Commutopia in WBengal; they can't abide the thought of its slipping from their hands into those of the forceful Faithful and that WB could become an islamic pardees in future.
(Such fears are common. The christoislamicommunists are always converting each other anyway, 'cause none of the variations of this violent, destructive ideology is satisfying to people.)
http://www.outlookindia.com/full.asp?fodna...atakorner&sid=1
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Kolkata Korner</b>
Jaideep Mazumdar
<b>Menacing Development</b>
The popularity, and the mileage, that the <b>Jamiat-e-Ulema Hind</b> has gained recently for its espousal of the cause of farmers bode ill for Bengal. I'm not going into the debate over the nature of this organisationâmany, including Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee and his predecessor Jyoti Basu, have tagged it as a communal outfit. Its chief, Siddiqullah Choudhury, is no doubt playing the communal card by stating that the Bengal government has chosen land that mostly belongs to or is cultivated by Muslims for acquisition for industrial and other projects. He charges the Bengal government with discriminating against Muslims. One must say that whatever the Left Front government in Bengal is, it is not an anti-minority or communal one. The Jamait's actions and statements are dangerous since they have the potential to polarise the people of the state. Such statements will only serve to push many Hindus towards the Sangh Parivaar which won't miss the opportunity to cash in on the situation and strengthen its vicious and vile presence in Bengal. This should be avoided at all costs. Bengal has been free from the menace of communalism and the vicious Sangh parivaar (including the BJP) ought to be kept away from Bengal. The only way this can be done is by impressing upon the Jamait that its course of action is fraught with <b>dangerous consequences</b>.
(Watch out islamis. This is communist-speak for "this means war".)<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
(1) So if the reds say the islamis are communal, then they are? But if anyone else says it, they'll cry foul.
(2) Unless they get a dar-ul-islam, Islamics will always say they are discriminated against. They will always play the communal card (so too the reds, of course). Where's the surprise? Is it special because in this case the communists are the ones to get stung? Well, if you play with scorpions...
(3) Would the islamis and reds hurry up and purge each other from Bengal.
(Such fears are common. The christoislamicommunists are always converting each other anyway, 'cause none of the variations of this violent, destructive ideology is satisfying to people.)
http://www.outlookindia.com/full.asp?fodna...atakorner&sid=1
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Kolkata Korner</b>
Jaideep Mazumdar
<b>Menacing Development</b>
The popularity, and the mileage, that the <b>Jamiat-e-Ulema Hind</b> has gained recently for its espousal of the cause of farmers bode ill for Bengal. I'm not going into the debate over the nature of this organisationâmany, including Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee and his predecessor Jyoti Basu, have tagged it as a communal outfit. Its chief, Siddiqullah Choudhury, is no doubt playing the communal card by stating that the Bengal government has chosen land that mostly belongs to or is cultivated by Muslims for acquisition for industrial and other projects. He charges the Bengal government with discriminating against Muslims. One must say that whatever the Left Front government in Bengal is, it is not an anti-minority or communal one. The Jamait's actions and statements are dangerous since they have the potential to polarise the people of the state. Such statements will only serve to push many Hindus towards the Sangh Parivaar which won't miss the opportunity to cash in on the situation and strengthen its vicious and vile presence in Bengal. This should be avoided at all costs. Bengal has been free from the menace of communalism and the vicious Sangh parivaar (including the BJP) ought to be kept away from Bengal. The only way this can be done is by impressing upon the Jamait that its course of action is fraught with <b>dangerous consequences</b>.
(Watch out islamis. This is communist-speak for "this means war".)<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
(1) So if the reds say the islamis are communal, then they are? But if anyone else says it, they'll cry foul.
(2) Unless they get a dar-ul-islam, Islamics will always say they are discriminated against. They will always play the communal card (so too the reds, of course). Where's the surprise? Is it special because in this case the communists are the ones to get stung? Well, if you play with scorpions...
(3) Would the islamis and reds hurry up and purge each other from Bengal.