On the same matter as previous post:
http://nz.news.yahoo.com//070302/5/3sz.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Friday March 2, 07:31 PM
<b>Pakistan arrests one of Taliban's top three</b>
ISLAMABAD/KABUL (Reuters) - Pakistani security forces captured one of the Taliban's three most senior leaders <b>just hours after U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney's unannounced visit to Pakistan earlier this week</b>, a senior security official and Taliban sources said.
(Looks more and more like they have people ready to hand-over as 'top terrorist' whenever the situation calls for it. Including having some person on stand-by to please US whenever displeased US representative drops by - this covers even unexpected visits.
But it will mean more moolah for Terroristan as US pays for 'AQ suspects' - who are often actually random people, including Hindus, nabbed by ISI just for this purpose. See Mudy's post 217 of previous Pak -9 thread)
The capture of Mullah Obaidullah Akhund marked the first Pakistan arrest of a senior leader of the Islamist militia since it was driven from power in Afghanistan in 2001 when thousands of its fighters fled into Pakistan.
The sources told Reuters that Akhund, the third most senior member of the Taliban's 10-member leadership council, was arrested late on Monday in the southwest city of Quetta.
Government and military spokesmen denied the arrest had been made -- or said they had no knowledge of it -- when asked by Reuters, but the story was also front page news in Dawn, a leading Pakistani daily, on Friday.
(Hmm. The above makes no sense. If they're willing to publish it in an English language Pak paper that even people outside TSP read, then why not in Reuters?
Unless they sold the story as an 'early-exclusive' to Dawn, of course <!--emo&
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='wink.gif' /><!--endemo--> )
"Mullah Omar's deputy Obaidullah captured" was the headline in a report that was also sourced to an unnamed official.
Aside from being on the leadership council headed by Mullah Mohammad Omar, Akhund was also defence minister in the Taliban government before it fell.
The arrest comes at a time when the Bush administration is facing a welter of scepticism from Democrats, the American media and several think-tanks over Pakistan's role as an ally in the war on terrorism.
Cheney had asked Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf to do more to stop al Qaeda rebuilding from safe havens in Pakistani tribal lands and step up efforts to thwart a spring offensive by the Taliban against Afghan and NATO troops.
<b>As defence minister, Akhund he was believed to have liaised closely with Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence during the years when the Taliban was in power in Kabul and could count on Pakistani support.</b>
<b>FIERCE CLASHES</b>
Akhund came from Panjwai, a district in the southern Afghan province of Kandahar that saw some of the fiercest clashes between the insurgents and allied forces last year.
The Pakistani security official said Akhund's arrest was the culmination of a planned operation and not a result of Cheney's visit.
Taliban sources, speaking on satellite telephones from undisclosed locations, said Akhund was caught at the home of one of his relatives at the Baluchistan provincial capital.
(Proves Taliban and ISI are buddies. ISI tells Taliban to hop to it, and what'd ya know? Taliban obliges.)
They said two other Taliban leaders had been arrested in Quetta this week, but the Pakistani security official could not confirm this.
"It's quite a move," Ahmed Rashid, a respected Pakistani journalist and author of "Taliban", a seminal study of the Islamist militia, commented.
"He wasn't a commander, but he and Mullah Beradar were key links to commanders in the field. He was in the shura (council) and very important," Rashid said.
While Akhund's capture would represent a major coup, it sits uneasily with Pakistan's past denials of allegations that Taliban leaders were running the Afghan insurgency from Quetta.
<b>Musharraf said last month that he was "500 percent" sure that Mullah Omar was in Afghanistan, though he admits there are Taliban fighters in Pakistan.</b>
(But who believes/eats Poisonous Mushroom anyway?)
<b>The lack of arrests in the past fed speculation that Pakistani intelligence services or rogue agents have allowed Taliban leaders to operate freely.</b>
Having supported the Taliban prior to al Qaeda's September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States, Pakistan has struggled to shake off suspicions that its spies continue to play a double game in case the West's commitment to Afghanistan does not last.
U.S. generals have spoken of Taliban "command and control" centres on Pakistani territory.
Yet NATO officials have thanked Pakistan for its help in several recent counter-insurgency operations, including a U.S. air strike that killed a senior commander, Mullah Akhtar Mohammad Osmani, in southern Afghanistan on December 19.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Officially: US doesn't trust Pakistan at present.
Unofficially, they're chums (after all, TSP helped in curtailing Soviets in Afghanistan). Terroristan plays its scripted part well.
'Sit. Terrorise. Good dog.'
http://nz.news.yahoo.com//070302/5/3sz.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Friday March 2, 07:31 PM
<b>Pakistan arrests one of Taliban's top three</b>
ISLAMABAD/KABUL (Reuters) - Pakistani security forces captured one of the Taliban's three most senior leaders <b>just hours after U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney's unannounced visit to Pakistan earlier this week</b>, a senior security official and Taliban sources said.
(Looks more and more like they have people ready to hand-over as 'top terrorist' whenever the situation calls for it. Including having some person on stand-by to please US whenever displeased US representative drops by - this covers even unexpected visits.
But it will mean more moolah for Terroristan as US pays for 'AQ suspects' - who are often actually random people, including Hindus, nabbed by ISI just for this purpose. See Mudy's post 217 of previous Pak -9 thread)
The capture of Mullah Obaidullah Akhund marked the first Pakistan arrest of a senior leader of the Islamist militia since it was driven from power in Afghanistan in 2001 when thousands of its fighters fled into Pakistan.
The sources told Reuters that Akhund, the third most senior member of the Taliban's 10-member leadership council, was arrested late on Monday in the southwest city of Quetta.
Government and military spokesmen denied the arrest had been made -- or said they had no knowledge of it -- when asked by Reuters, but the story was also front page news in Dawn, a leading Pakistani daily, on Friday.
(Hmm. The above makes no sense. If they're willing to publish it in an English language Pak paper that even people outside TSP read, then why not in Reuters?
Unless they sold the story as an 'early-exclusive' to Dawn, of course <!--emo&
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='wink.gif' /><!--endemo--> )"Mullah Omar's deputy Obaidullah captured" was the headline in a report that was also sourced to an unnamed official.
Aside from being on the leadership council headed by Mullah Mohammad Omar, Akhund was also defence minister in the Taliban government before it fell.
The arrest comes at a time when the Bush administration is facing a welter of scepticism from Democrats, the American media and several think-tanks over Pakistan's role as an ally in the war on terrorism.
Cheney had asked Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf to do more to stop al Qaeda rebuilding from safe havens in Pakistani tribal lands and step up efforts to thwart a spring offensive by the Taliban against Afghan and NATO troops.
<b>As defence minister, Akhund he was believed to have liaised closely with Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence during the years when the Taliban was in power in Kabul and could count on Pakistani support.</b>
<b>FIERCE CLASHES</b>
Akhund came from Panjwai, a district in the southern Afghan province of Kandahar that saw some of the fiercest clashes between the insurgents and allied forces last year.
The Pakistani security official said Akhund's arrest was the culmination of a planned operation and not a result of Cheney's visit.
Taliban sources, speaking on satellite telephones from undisclosed locations, said Akhund was caught at the home of one of his relatives at the Baluchistan provincial capital.
(Proves Taliban and ISI are buddies. ISI tells Taliban to hop to it, and what'd ya know? Taliban obliges.)
They said two other Taliban leaders had been arrested in Quetta this week, but the Pakistani security official could not confirm this.
"It's quite a move," Ahmed Rashid, a respected Pakistani journalist and author of "Taliban", a seminal study of the Islamist militia, commented.
"He wasn't a commander, but he and Mullah Beradar were key links to commanders in the field. He was in the shura (council) and very important," Rashid said.
While Akhund's capture would represent a major coup, it sits uneasily with Pakistan's past denials of allegations that Taliban leaders were running the Afghan insurgency from Quetta.
<b>Musharraf said last month that he was "500 percent" sure that Mullah Omar was in Afghanistan, though he admits there are Taliban fighters in Pakistan.</b>
(But who believes/eats Poisonous Mushroom anyway?)
<b>The lack of arrests in the past fed speculation that Pakistani intelligence services or rogue agents have allowed Taliban leaders to operate freely.</b>
Having supported the Taliban prior to al Qaeda's September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States, Pakistan has struggled to shake off suspicions that its spies continue to play a double game in case the West's commitment to Afghanistan does not last.
U.S. generals have spoken of Taliban "command and control" centres on Pakistani territory.
Yet NATO officials have thanked Pakistan for its help in several recent counter-insurgency operations, including a U.S. air strike that killed a senior commander, Mullah Akhtar Mohammad Osmani, in southern Afghanistan on December 19.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Officially: US doesn't trust Pakistan at present.
Unofficially, they're chums (after all, TSP helped in curtailing Soviets in Afghanistan). Terroristan plays its scripted part well.
'Sit. Terrorise. Good dog.'