03-20-2007, 10:13 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-dhu+Mar 19 2007, 06:37 PM-->QUOTE(dhu @ Mar 19 2007, 06:37 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Lastly, there is also a traitorous class of arrogant brahminist scholars who are thoroughly brainwashed with western methods. They have their eyes trained on all developing fronts, including "heathen". their agenda is to further their power over the sources. Elst has merely taken their bait that they are impartial. This last class believes that "philological conclusions" should impact Hindu practices. In this they are essentially western agents.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Who are these Brahminist scholars? Hindu traitors definitely have many of *brahmin origin* (e.g. D.N. Jha) in their midst, but perhaps you are aware of the dharma rule that the brAhmaNa who does not perform his saMdhya is not a brAhmaNa. So these of brahminical origin are not considered brAhmaNas by practicing ones and do nothing good for the brAhmaNas in particular or Hindus in general.
Or is that brahmins have been there behind all problems ? I puzzled by the need to bring in brAhmaNa-s here.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Who are these Brahminist scholars? Hindu traitors definitely have many of *brahmin origin* (e.g. D.N. Jha) in their midst, but perhaps you are aware of the dharma rule that the brAhmaNa who does not perform his saMdhya is not a brAhmaNa. So these of brahminical origin are not considered brAhmaNas by practicing ones and do nothing good for the brAhmaNas in particular or Hindus in general.
Or is that brahmins have been there behind all problems ? I puzzled by the need to bring in brAhmaNa-s here.