04-02-2007, 05:11 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Husky+Apr 1 2007, 05:38 AM-->QUOTE(Husky @ Apr 1 2007, 05:38 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->http://www.cwo.com/~lucumi/india.html<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Siddis were Ethiopians kidnapped into slavery by But later, Egypt was taken over by another ethnic group and its culture. And this happened repeatedly until the time when Greece took over Egypt (Alexander's time certainly, before that possibly). Cleopatra of the 1st century BCE was a Greekfor his ancestors either.
But why believe any Indian literature or tradition to this effect - none of which make mention of his Egyptian origins or ancestry? Why not believe some random European who thinks Buddha had 'woolly' or 'red' hair and, like Indologists, ignore the Indian tradition altogether or misinterpret it wherever useful to <i>make</i> Buddha fit the Oryan or Else There are a thousand sites like the one mentioned in the previous post. There's nothing different or special in this one to bring it up.
<b>CORRECTIONS:</b> lots of typos, spelling and plain absent-minded errors in the above are corrected; the changes are in blue.
[right][snapback]66408[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
In many pictures Buddha has mongol eyes.As he was near nepal,maybe he has some mongol ancestry also?(beside his african and european ancestry <!--emo&
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif' /><!--endemo--> )
Arheological speaking,the ruins of Egipt are older then thoose of Ethiopia or Sudan.If you wonder how faraonic egiptians look like,look at today egiptians.I belive that egiptians of today(and same about the greeks) have more subsaharian genes then thier ancestors.Was a big trade of slaves from Kush in ancient and medieval world.So big that even scandinavians have 0.6% subsaharian genes.
i read that an white can become black (whit broad nose) by staying 20000 years in a tropical habitat.
Ethiopians speak a semitic language by the way(not hamitic) but semito-hamitic was replace whit afro-asiatic because of racist conotations of the former term.
Some belive that Sphinx is 10000 years old because his erosion,who they belive was produce by rain ,which was a common thing in Egipt 10000 years ago .But the erosion of Sphinx is produce by salt not water.A phenomen stil happend today.So date for the Sphinx is 2600bc.
If we think at the genetic bottle-necks ,then we have 5 "races"-african(subsaharian),caucasian(including north africa !),mongol,australian,american.But are no clear cuts delimitations of these "races.Is clear that this bottle-necks are created by separation of continents by waters and deserts betwin.
Australian aborigenals are same geneticaly distant from africans as european are(even we are tented to see australians more close to africans because their dark complexion).
PS-i read that roma gypsy are the most genetic similar whit sinhala people.Qwestion-sinhala are people from Sri Lanka?Are the same whit the singhalese?
But why believe any Indian literature or tradition to this effect - none of which make mention of his Egyptian origins or ancestry? Why not believe some random European who thinks Buddha had 'woolly' or 'red' hair and, like Indologists, ignore the Indian tradition altogether or misinterpret it wherever useful to <i>make</i> Buddha fit the Oryan or Else There are a thousand sites like the one mentioned in the previous post. There's nothing different or special in this one to bring it up.
<b>CORRECTIONS:</b> lots of typos, spelling and plain absent-minded errors in the above are corrected; the changes are in blue.
[right][snapback]66408[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
In many pictures Buddha has mongol eyes.As he was near nepal,maybe he has some mongol ancestry also?(beside his african and european ancestry <!--emo&
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif' /><!--endemo--> )Arheological speaking,the ruins of Egipt are older then thoose of Ethiopia or Sudan.If you wonder how faraonic egiptians look like,look at today egiptians.I belive that egiptians of today(and same about the greeks) have more subsaharian genes then thier ancestors.Was a big trade of slaves from Kush in ancient and medieval world.So big that even scandinavians have 0.6% subsaharian genes.
i read that an white can become black (whit broad nose) by staying 20000 years in a tropical habitat.
Ethiopians speak a semitic language by the way(not hamitic) but semito-hamitic was replace whit afro-asiatic because of racist conotations of the former term.
Some belive that Sphinx is 10000 years old because his erosion,who they belive was produce by rain ,which was a common thing in Egipt 10000 years ago .But the erosion of Sphinx is produce by salt not water.A phenomen stil happend today.So date for the Sphinx is 2600bc.
If we think at the genetic bottle-necks ,then we have 5 "races"-african(subsaharian),caucasian(including north africa !),mongol,australian,american.But are no clear cuts delimitations of these "races.Is clear that this bottle-necks are created by separation of continents by waters and deserts betwin.
Australian aborigenals are same geneticaly distant from africans as european are(even we are tented to see australians more close to africans because their dark complexion).
PS-i read that roma gypsy are the most genetic similar whit sinhala people.Qwestion-sinhala are people from Sri Lanka?Are the same whit the singhalese?