04-17-2007, 08:46 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Husky+Apr 17 2007, 08:34 PM-->QUOTE(Husky @ Apr 17 2007, 08:34 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->
<!--QuoteBegin-Raju+Apr 17 2007, 06:45 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Raju @ Apr 17 2007, 06:45 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Say, if an Abdul Kalam or a Feroz Khan want to refer to themselves as a hindu or look at things from that perspective, then their narrative is important as well and needs to be heard.Â
It is important not to dismiss such people as psec or under any other nomenclature.[right][snapback]67233[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Every Hindu knows Abdul Kalam is neither anti-Hindu nor a psecular. I've read that he reads the Bhagavad Gita. Every day, I think it was. If he says he's a Hindu, Hindus aren't going to contest that. Why such an irrelevant example?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Exactly, just go by the actions and not by the speech.
That will make it clear whose narrative needs to heard and whose doesn't
<!--QuoteBegin-Raju+Apr 17 2007, 06:45 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Raju @ Apr 17 2007, 06:45 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Say, if an Abdul Kalam or a Feroz Khan want to refer to themselves as a hindu or look at things from that perspective, then their narrative is important as well and needs to be heard.Â
It is important not to dismiss such people as psec or under any other nomenclature.[right][snapback]67233[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Every Hindu knows Abdul Kalam is neither anti-Hindu nor a psecular. I've read that he reads the Bhagavad Gita. Every day, I think it was. If he says he's a Hindu, Hindus aren't going to contest that. Why such an irrelevant example?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Exactly, just go by the actions and not by the speech.
That will make it clear whose narrative needs to heard and whose doesn't