Communal Relations - Conflicting Narratives

[Guest]

<!--QuoteBegin-Raju+Apr 17 2007, 08:46 PM-->QUOTE(Raju @ Apr 17 2007, 08:46 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->
That will make it clear whose narrative needs to heard and whose doesn't
[right][snapback]67254[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I will utilize this statement to pointout one fact, as a reminder of what I am talking about.

Screw the question of whose narrative needs to be heard and whose does not need to be heard for one minute, let your mind go blank and think..

Whose narrative is being heard right now in the world?

What is being heard is not a complete Hindu narrative. It is a "Hindu" narrative written by all sorts people including conquerors, leftists, marxists etc.

Where the hell is the Hindu narrative?

There is no Hindu narrative. So what is all this argument about what should be heard or not. All that I see is non Hindu narrative.

My grandmother used to claim that there was a Tamil song that went

<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><i>
"Adi" endruthukke avale illai
Pillai pere Ramakrishna
</i><!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->


It means "I have no woman yet to call my wife", but I have decided to call my son "Ramakrishna"

See what I mean?

Get a damn Hindu narrative out and let people on here if necessary who claim they are Hindus bring their narrative out to compete with and displace all the narratives that are already doing the rounds. Argument that some narratives are bad is pointless when there is no proper positive Hindu narrative doing the rounds at all.

Of course there are bad and false narratives doing the rounds. How pointless can an argument get?