04-20-2007, 10:11 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Husky+Apr 20 2007, 09:39 PM-->QUOTE(Husky @ Apr 20 2007, 09:39 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->
There is a difference between being (1) fearless because you know what it is you are up against and are still not afraid; and (2) fearless because you are ignorant of what it is you face.
Your definition of "That is what a Hindu is" does seem to fall into (2) rather.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Whether the Hindu gets screwed with our without his consent is immaterial when he is getting screwed both ways. But the question is - is the Hindu getting screwed at all by conversion, or is he screwing the faith?
There is a difference between being (1) fearless because you know what it is you are up against and are still not afraid; and (2) fearless because you are ignorant of what it is you face.
Your definition of "That is what a Hindu is" does seem to fall into (2) rather.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Whether the Hindu gets screwed with our without his consent is immaterial when he is getting screwed both ways. But the question is - is the Hindu getting screwed at all by conversion, or is he screwing the faith?