04-21-2007, 07:42 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-SwamyG+Apr 21 2007, 07:31 AM-->QUOTE(SwamyG @ Apr 21 2007, 07:31 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->
If you are trying to find out (or make us find out) what needs to be protected in Hinduism, how can we conclude that legal routes need to be taken? Wouldn't the Judge ask the same question that you are asking?
[right][snapback]67575[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--emo&--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Good question.
I am thinking on two tracks simultaneously.
One is to oppose evanjihadism on legalities and technicalities whether it is a threat or not.
The other is to find out how it is a threat.
Overall I consider it to be an egregious insult to my belief by closed minds. No harm in looking at all possibilities.
If you are trying to find out (or make us find out) what needs to be protected in Hinduism, how can we conclude that legal routes need to be taken? Wouldn't the Judge ask the same question that you are asking?
[right][snapback]67575[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--emo&--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Good question.
I am thinking on two tracks simultaneously.
One is to oppose evanjihadism on legalities and technicalities whether it is a threat or not.
The other is to find out how it is a threat.
Overall I consider it to be an egregious insult to my belief by closed minds. No harm in looking at all possibilities.