04-26-2007, 11:37 PM
i think atheism is inclusive in the theory of hinduism, if hinduism stands for a "theory of everything". atheists are those "believers", whose beliefs are about "non-existence" rather existence of supreme force. now, it is left to the atheists, what they believe as supreme and what is not supreme.
atheists normally argue from the perspective of "christianity theory".. atheists are definitions of anti-christ, and has nothing to do with hinduism or better SD, since the word "hindu" itself a persian word.
recently met an atheists, as he invited me for a dinner. arguments were filed, and finally he was disproved, that if I would classify something that existed that is supreme force. I said, first you should believe in me saying something is supreme within my definition and understanding as supreme. don't be in a magical world. he agreed, and I said why don't we see anything in nature as supreme. there were no arguments, he was pure naturalist.
the problems come when we take a view and get complexes like modernity & tribalistics, super natural and natural, magic and illusions, God concepts, and all that is written in the other's religious texts are inferior to what we have.
imho, these are all human issues and as such religious issues. not because, that super natural being wishes that, there exists a problem for humans of different faith. this can't be proved, since the super-natural itself is a concept derived out of mis-understanding of the unknowns.
i am a hindu, hence i don't dance does not qualify as a hindu narrative, as its not a collective theory. its something personal, and that person simply puts the group interest in jeopardy while boasting it as "self" religion. its a fallacy, that we should not support., unless proven that is true.
i think, we should be looking for narratives that can be applicable to a hindu group.
atheists normally argue from the perspective of "christianity theory".. atheists are definitions of anti-christ, and has nothing to do with hinduism or better SD, since the word "hindu" itself a persian word.
recently met an atheists, as he invited me for a dinner. arguments were filed, and finally he was disproved, that if I would classify something that existed that is supreme force. I said, first you should believe in me saying something is supreme within my definition and understanding as supreme. don't be in a magical world. he agreed, and I said why don't we see anything in nature as supreme. there were no arguments, he was pure naturalist.
the problems come when we take a view and get complexes like modernity & tribalistics, super natural and natural, magic and illusions, God concepts, and all that is written in the other's religious texts are inferior to what we have.
imho, these are all human issues and as such religious issues. not because, that super natural being wishes that, there exists a problem for humans of different faith. this can't be proved, since the super-natural itself is a concept derived out of mis-understanding of the unknowns.
i am a hindu, hence i don't dance does not qualify as a hindu narrative, as its not a collective theory. its something personal, and that person simply puts the group interest in jeopardy while boasting it as "self" religion. its a fallacy, that we should not support., unless proven that is true.
i think, we should be looking for narratives that can be applicable to a hindu group.