04-27-2007, 09:27 PM
sectorial analysis will lead to inter-sect issues and complexities including personal bias and depicting it on to the religion. i am a brahmin, i hate mr. x of y religion. hence i hate y religion is the larger mentallity of normal daily-wagers and street talks of hinduism.
hindu ways of living is only getting perfected with collection technique from various sects.. and in the process, if the issues are taken out of proportion to highlight only the issues and not come to a collective narration, then we fail on the objectives.
hating other sects/caste/religion/sub religious categories is human thing. its a social problem, and nothing it adds to hindu narration. i guess, we are losing the point that the narration criteria must highlight were it blends, what is that makes that sect merge into, or give into the whole~. lets forget about the greats like biggie acharyas and other religious leaders from the point of narration discussion, since what they say and do is pure gandhistic, in the sense, its damn difficult to implement for the mass, other than the creators of such theories and practices.
here is a narration, my mom who lived most of her times with my IAF dad, all over India, and many a times in God's own country land kerala. Though kerala and TN are divided and sub-divided as they themselves being possessed about this evolving nature of sub-dividing and differentiating ( i think there should be some differentiation formulae already out there in some form of sancrit text), she would always narrate the positives.. about how each of these sects in kerala respect one another., inspite of deep differences.
in times of crisis, religion and sects don't play.. its human sense at the end that survives. hence lets jolt that sense with some extra power and share in all those positives into the narration.
hindu ways of living is only getting perfected with collection technique from various sects.. and in the process, if the issues are taken out of proportion to highlight only the issues and not come to a collective narration, then we fail on the objectives.
hating other sects/caste/religion/sub religious categories is human thing. its a social problem, and nothing it adds to hindu narration. i guess, we are losing the point that the narration criteria must highlight were it blends, what is that makes that sect merge into, or give into the whole~. lets forget about the greats like biggie acharyas and other religious leaders from the point of narration discussion, since what they say and do is pure gandhistic, in the sense, its damn difficult to implement for the mass, other than the creators of such theories and practices.
here is a narration, my mom who lived most of her times with my IAF dad, all over India, and many a times in God's own country land kerala. Though kerala and TN are divided and sub-divided as they themselves being possessed about this evolving nature of sub-dividing and differentiating ( i think there should be some differentiation formulae already out there in some form of sancrit text), she would always narrate the positives.. about how each of these sects in kerala respect one another., inspite of deep differences.
in times of crisis, religion and sects don't play.. its human sense at the end that survives. hence lets jolt that sense with some extra power and share in all those positives into the narration.