<!--QuoteBegin-dhu+May 20 2007, 09:42 AM-->QUOTE(dhu @ May 20 2007, 09:42 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->That pic is much more than that. It basically summarizes the dominant western psy-ops against asia.[right][snapback]69058[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->You're right. Asia - especially E - is always treated as the 'feminine' to the 'masculine' west.
Whereas christonations like to accuse other civilisations of being patriarchical, it is really the christoculture that is fundamentally so. Their men may marry out - it's expected of them, part of that 'desirability' thing, to become the epitomy of what women all over the world supposedly want. It's seen as dominance: marry the 'recessive' Asian woman or African woman or other attractive Hamitic female. And it's exactly why they projected it onto their fantasy of the fictitious Oryan invader intermixing with the female oppressees. Nothing to do with reality of course. It merely gives themselves an imaginary past and present super 'appeal', which a few radicals among them then try to rationalise as some kind of evolutionary advantage they have.
But all hell breaks loose if it was a christian WASPy woman who married an African or the 'effeminate' (as stereotyped on US tele, not my view) E Asian man. That's a social taboo, and a long-time taboo on TV.
US has next to no exposure to E Asian men. The latter are very goodlooking and I don't see why their nations' women would consider choosing an American or other western (or otherwise non-local) person over their own male population, unless they happened to <i>meet</i> with someone from outside whom they found compatible.
The same holds true for all populations. Maybe that's another reason why hollywood is pressing forth in so many countries in the world: to indoctrinate all viewers into what they want them to think is the ideal. Not going to happen: after viewing one Takeshi Kaneshiro movie for example, Brad Pitt's female fans will all have migrated.
Whereas christonations like to accuse other civilisations of being patriarchical, it is really the christoculture that is fundamentally so. Their men may marry out - it's expected of them, part of that 'desirability' thing, to become the epitomy of what women all over the world supposedly want. It's seen as dominance: marry the 'recessive' Asian woman or African woman or other attractive Hamitic female. And it's exactly why they projected it onto their fantasy of the fictitious Oryan invader intermixing with the female oppressees. Nothing to do with reality of course. It merely gives themselves an imaginary past and present super 'appeal', which a few radicals among them then try to rationalise as some kind of evolutionary advantage they have.
But all hell breaks loose if it was a christian WASPy woman who married an African or the 'effeminate' (as stereotyped on US tele, not my view) E Asian man. That's a social taboo, and a long-time taboo on TV.
US has next to no exposure to E Asian men. The latter are very goodlooking and I don't see why their nations' women would consider choosing an American or other western (or otherwise non-local) person over their own male population, unless they happened to <i>meet</i> with someone from outside whom they found compatible.
The same holds true for all populations. Maybe that's another reason why hollywood is pressing forth in so many countries in the world: to indoctrinate all viewers into what they want them to think is the ideal. Not going to happen: after viewing one Takeshi Kaneshiro movie for example, Brad Pitt's female fans will all have migrated.