05-25-2007, 06:05 AM
What is wrong with this
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The Indo_Aryan was a tribe that lived near central asia and moved out of its origin many thousands of years ago(probably 10,000 to 15,000 yrs ago). They may have lived next to the Aral or the Black Sea, when their home land was flooded due to the end of the ice age and submerged their city, they scattered through out the world in desperation. This could have well been Atlantis. Although Atlantis could be a myth the dispersion of the Aryan tribe is not.
Sanskrit is one of the Indo-Aryan language's and considered the most oldest and complex of the older Indo-Aryan language's. All Indo-Aryan Languages still have words that are remarkably close.
Eg..,
"Navagathe" in Sanskrit is "Navigation" in English
"Martho" in Sanskrit is "Marbar" in Persian and "Murder" in English..
"Nam" in Sanskrit is "Name" in English..
"Thu" in Sanskrit is "You" in English
"May" in Sanskrit is "Me" in English.
As we see the language is well documented to be of common source. So if the language where Common why cant the faith and God also have been common? If man knew how to talk then he also knew how to worship.
Original names of Yahweh, the original name of Yahweh the god of Jews is spell as following before the Christians miss spelt it, this is from a Jewish web site.
"Ha-Shem,"
"Shem ha-Meforash," = "Shiva" in Sanskrit
"Shem ha-Meyuḥad
"I am that" = "Aham Brahma" in Sanskrit( the word "Aham" is "Iam", just like me is may in sanskrit.)
" Abraham" = "Hay Brahma"
If Aryans had a similar sounding language then why not a similar sounding God? Was this God really a God or a man pointing to the self? To my understanding he should have been someone like the Buddha, enlightened man. The sentence I am that I am is only a pointer to the self that showing truth is in you or "though are that."
If a single language and a single people could become so disconnected and diffrent over the years then their God also shared the same fate. In the end a simple thing as showing the self has taken a long turn to become something else.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The Indo_Aryan was a tribe that lived near central asia and moved out of its origin many thousands of years ago(probably 10,000 to 15,000 yrs ago). They may have lived next to the Aral or the Black Sea, when their home land was flooded due to the end of the ice age and submerged their city, they scattered through out the world in desperation. This could have well been Atlantis. Although Atlantis could be a myth the dispersion of the Aryan tribe is not.
Sanskrit is one of the Indo-Aryan language's and considered the most oldest and complex of the older Indo-Aryan language's. All Indo-Aryan Languages still have words that are remarkably close.
Eg..,
"Navagathe" in Sanskrit is "Navigation" in English
"Martho" in Sanskrit is "Marbar" in Persian and "Murder" in English..
"Nam" in Sanskrit is "Name" in English..
"Thu" in Sanskrit is "You" in English
"May" in Sanskrit is "Me" in English.
As we see the language is well documented to be of common source. So if the language where Common why cant the faith and God also have been common? If man knew how to talk then he also knew how to worship.
Original names of Yahweh, the original name of Yahweh the god of Jews is spell as following before the Christians miss spelt it, this is from a Jewish web site.
"Ha-Shem,"
"Shem ha-Meforash," = "Shiva" in Sanskrit
"Shem ha-Meyuḥad
"I am that" = "Aham Brahma" in Sanskrit( the word "Aham" is "Iam", just like me is may in sanskrit.)
" Abraham" = "Hay Brahma"
If Aryans had a similar sounding language then why not a similar sounding God? Was this God really a God or a man pointing to the self? To my understanding he should have been someone like the Buddha, enlightened man. The sentence I am that I am is only a pointer to the self that showing truth is in you or "though are that."
If a single language and a single people could become so disconnected and diffrent over the years then their God also shared the same fate. In the end a simple thing as showing the self has taken a long turn to become something else.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->