06-01-2007, 09:28 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-dhu+May 28 2007, 04:50 AM-->QUOTE(dhu @ May 28 2007, 04:50 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin-acharya+May 27 2007, 10:13 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(acharya @ May 27 2007, 10:13 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Can somebody explain this
<!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->
As we see the language is well documented to be of common source. So if the language where Common why cant the faith and God also have been common? If man knew how to talk then he also knew how to worship.
If Aryans had a similar sounding language then why not a similar sounding God? Was this God really a God or a man pointing to the self? To my understanding he should have been someone like the Buddha, enlightened man. The sentence I am that I am is only a pointer to the self that showing truth is in you or "though are that."
<b>
If a single language and a single people could become so disconnected and different over the years then their God also shared the same fate.</b> In the end a simple thing as showing the self has taken a long turn to become something else.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
[right][snapback]69404[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It is a project of modernism wherein the Sovereign Lord has been replaced by a mutitude of secular Human sovereigns. Buddhism with its empahsis on self is a key ingredient that needs to be appropraited at all costs. Underlying everything is the biblical need to justify diversity whereas diversity is the default mode of the universe.
[right][snapback]69461[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The note is a clever way to diffuse the information so that common things between two people are brought in show a common ancestry. Indians have been fooled and have blindly accepted this common ancestry without looking at the motivation and long term plan of the Europeans in this so called research.
<!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->
As we see the language is well documented to be of common source. So if the language where Common why cant the faith and God also have been common? If man knew how to talk then he also knew how to worship.
If Aryans had a similar sounding language then why not a similar sounding God? Was this God really a God or a man pointing to the self? To my understanding he should have been someone like the Buddha, enlightened man. The sentence I am that I am is only a pointer to the self that showing truth is in you or "though are that."
<b>
If a single language and a single people could become so disconnected and different over the years then their God also shared the same fate.</b> In the end a simple thing as showing the self has taken a long turn to become something else.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
[right][snapback]69404[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It is a project of modernism wherein the Sovereign Lord has been replaced by a mutitude of secular Human sovereigns. Buddhism with its empahsis on self is a key ingredient that needs to be appropraited at all costs. Underlying everything is the biblical need to justify diversity whereas diversity is the default mode of the universe.
[right][snapback]69461[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The note is a clever way to diffuse the information so that common things between two people are brought in show a common ancestry. Indians have been fooled and have blindly accepted this common ancestry without looking at the motivation and long term plan of the Europeans in this so called research.