<!--emo&
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='sad.gif' /><!--endemo--> Good grief.
Post 43 (myself) - sorry I didn't notice it before:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Yet many Hindus still insist on defending these terrorist ideologies from any justified criticism. It's so unspeakably sad how their misplaced efforts make such people a great liability to Hinduism. (A past version of myself included, so not hypocritically criticizing only others <b>here</b>.)<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Seriously ambiguous.
I mean 'here' as in 'with this statement' of course. Not 'here' as in 'at IF'. IF being the only place that I've come across where Hindus have no romantic illusions about christoislamism. (Also learnt to shed some myself here - cheers.)
Now corrected the confusing wording in #43 itself.
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='sad.gif' /><!--endemo--> Good grief. Post 43 (myself) - sorry I didn't notice it before:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Yet many Hindus still insist on defending these terrorist ideologies from any justified criticism. It's so unspeakably sad how their misplaced efforts make such people a great liability to Hinduism. (A past version of myself included, so not hypocritically criticizing only others <b>here</b>.)<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Seriously ambiguous.
I mean 'here' as in 'with this statement' of course. Not 'here' as in 'at IF'. IF being the only place that I've come across where Hindus have no romantic illusions about christoislamism. (Also learnt to shed some myself here - cheers.)
Now corrected the confusing wording in #43 itself.