<!--QuoteBegin-Honsol+Jul 1 2007, 10:18 PM-->QUOTE(Honsol @ Jul 1 2007, 10:18 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->How do you explain that islam is more succesful then christianity or hinduism?
Some times i wonder,if Europe or USA will convert to islam.Most of europeans renunce to their old medieval religion.In their search of a new religion they gona choose the islam?
I imagine in year2050 a islamic Europe,USA,Russia(40% of population will be muslim by simple demographic growth).I imagine Ben Laden whit nuclear capabilites of USA.[right][snapback]70680[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Counterbreeding as Bharatvarsh suggested is good, but Europe needs less competitive and more permanent plans to combat the dangerous consequences of a demography shift towards islamism.
While non-muslims are still the majority in Europe, they should democratically vote in laws to send all terrorists and terrorist sympathizers back to their countries of origin.
This means closing those islami schools in NL where children and teachers cheered the WTC bombing; its board should be dissolved and sent packing, and so too the teachers, kids and their parents that participated in celebrating the mass murder.
(Ayaan Hirsi Ali advocates that there should be no islami schools at all - that all muslim children should go to regular schools. This will be better for integration, certainly to some extent.)
Eventually, this would mean that Europe will be left with only the safe muslims - and those of the islami ummah that aren't safe would at least learn to be better-behaved considering the consequences. Next to that, many seculars of islami-origin will be safe from persecution by jehadis.
While Germany didn't so much as wince when, somewhat over a decade ago, it sold its Roma population to other countries (and that too, in spite of the fact that regrouped fascists where waiting to gruesomely murder the Roma upon arrival), it now feels all PC and fuzzy-hearted when it comes to deporting <i>terrorists and terrorist sympathizers</i>? That's some seriously skewed sense of morals.
When sent back, the terrorists will - if not cheered outright by the islami ummah back home - be placed in Pakistani, Turkish or other prisons. (And don't terrorists deserve a jail sentence?) Thus there will be no human rights violations against deported islamoterrorists. (And even if any were ever sentenced to death in their islamic pardees - at least death-by-hanging sounds better than being electrocuted by The Chair.)
Europe just needs to be sensible: islam promises to destroy it, so Europe should just deport islamic inclinations (nipping terrorism in the bud). No harm done. Also need stricter immigration laws.
Some times i wonder,if Europe or USA will convert to islam.Most of europeans renunce to their old medieval religion.In their search of a new religion they gona choose the islam?
I imagine in year2050 a islamic Europe,USA,Russia(40% of population will be muslim by simple demographic growth).I imagine Ben Laden whit nuclear capabilites of USA.[right][snapback]70680[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Counterbreeding as Bharatvarsh suggested is good, but Europe needs less competitive and more permanent plans to combat the dangerous consequences of a demography shift towards islamism.
While non-muslims are still the majority in Europe, they should democratically vote in laws to send all terrorists and terrorist sympathizers back to their countries of origin.
This means closing those islami schools in NL where children and teachers cheered the WTC bombing; its board should be dissolved and sent packing, and so too the teachers, kids and their parents that participated in celebrating the mass murder.
(Ayaan Hirsi Ali advocates that there should be no islami schools at all - that all muslim children should go to regular schools. This will be better for integration, certainly to some extent.)
Eventually, this would mean that Europe will be left with only the safe muslims - and those of the islami ummah that aren't safe would at least learn to be better-behaved considering the consequences. Next to that, many seculars of islami-origin will be safe from persecution by jehadis.
While Germany didn't so much as wince when, somewhat over a decade ago, it sold its Roma population to other countries (and that too, in spite of the fact that regrouped fascists where waiting to gruesomely murder the Roma upon arrival), it now feels all PC and fuzzy-hearted when it comes to deporting <i>terrorists and terrorist sympathizers</i>? That's some seriously skewed sense of morals.
When sent back, the terrorists will - if not cheered outright by the islami ummah back home - be placed in Pakistani, Turkish or other prisons. (And don't terrorists deserve a jail sentence?) Thus there will be no human rights violations against deported islamoterrorists. (And even if any were ever sentenced to death in their islamic pardees - at least death-by-hanging sounds better than being electrocuted by The Chair.)
Europe just needs to be sensible: islam promises to destroy it, so Europe should just deport islamic inclinations (nipping terrorism in the bud). No harm done. Also need stricter immigration laws.