There can be no talk of Aryans, the word Aryan itself comes from a hypothetical group of people linguistically who wpoke PIE assumed by Western Scholars, there has been NO proof that peoples who spoke the so called PIE existed archelogically and genetically.
There are only two authenticate words Arya and Airya.
There can be no talk of Aryans in India unless one understand the very balant racism behind the whole idea of the same unfortunately the social engineering is being done for over centuries and is deeprooted, the word Aryan itself comes from a hypothetical group of people linguistically who spoke PIE assumed by Western Scholars, there has been NO proof that peoples who spoke the so called PIE existed archelogically and genetically.
There are only two authenticate words Arya and Airya, should not be mixed with the modern word coined in west aka Aryan.
Arya just means noble, like the English word Sir. India was called Aryavrat -- the land of gentiles. The name of Iran is a corruption of the word Aryan. When Indus valley dried up and people dispersed, they went in both directions -- to India and to Iran. THat is how the Indian and European languages became linked.
THe people who migrated to Europe founded the pagan (Celtic) civilisations there. The Brahmins became Druids (from sanskrti word Dravid -- druv -- liquid, vidya -- knowledge, thus "immersed in knowledge.") That is why Druidic rituals are similar to Hindus, like worshipping sacred groves and sun and ritual bathing in the river.
However, to admit this would mean that foundations of European civlisation have Indian origins. So all this drama about shoving this theory down our throats that it is actually Europeans (allegded Aryans) who came to India and taught us how to read and write. This is the 19th-century politics behind AIT. Now that AIT has been discarded, it is not long before it is accepted that the migration was from INdia to Europe, otherwise there is no explanation for similar languages or why Iliad and Odyssey have similar plots to Ramayan and Mahabharata.
These White historians are just trying to fudge the issue by canards and delay the inevitable.
There are only two authenticate words Arya and Airya.
There can be no talk of Aryans in India unless one understand the very balant racism behind the whole idea of the same unfortunately the social engineering is being done for over centuries and is deeprooted, the word Aryan itself comes from a hypothetical group of people linguistically who spoke PIE assumed by Western Scholars, there has been NO proof that peoples who spoke the so called PIE existed archelogically and genetically.
There are only two authenticate words Arya and Airya, should not be mixed with the modern word coined in west aka Aryan.
Arya just means noble, like the English word Sir. India was called Aryavrat -- the land of gentiles. The name of Iran is a corruption of the word Aryan. When Indus valley dried up and people dispersed, they went in both directions -- to India and to Iran. THat is how the Indian and European languages became linked.
THe people who migrated to Europe founded the pagan (Celtic) civilisations there. The Brahmins became Druids (from sanskrti word Dravid -- druv -- liquid, vidya -- knowledge, thus "immersed in knowledge.") That is why Druidic rituals are similar to Hindus, like worshipping sacred groves and sun and ritual bathing in the river.
However, to admit this would mean that foundations of European civlisation have Indian origins. So all this drama about shoving this theory down our throats that it is actually Europeans (allegded Aryans) who came to India and taught us how to read and write. This is the 19th-century politics behind AIT. Now that AIT has been discarded, it is not long before it is accepted that the migration was from INdia to Europe, otherwise there is no explanation for similar languages or why Iliad and Odyssey have similar plots to Ramayan and Mahabharata.
These White historians are just trying to fudge the issue by canards and delay the inevitable.