<!--QuoteBegin-Capt Manmohan Kumar+Sep 25 2007, 06:44 AM-->QUOTE(Capt Manmohan Kumar @ Sep 25 2007, 06:44 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->The cream of Indian policy makers including P Chidambaram, Kamal Nath, Montek Singh Ahluwalia broke bread with Henry Kissinger, former US secretary of state, Senator Charles Schumer and Brazilian trade minister Celso Amorin.
<b>Ironically</b>, Henry Kissinger had once said "The Indians are bastards." That was shortly before India went to war with Pakistan in 1971. "So if you ask me what about the things I said in 1971," Kissinger said at the dinner, "I now say, I am a convert," to applause.[right][snapback]73516[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
What <i>I</i> find <b>ironic</b> is that these Indians eating with him have such short memories. Guess they'll do just about anything to be accepted and fit in.
Here we go - from one of IF's main page articles itself:
http://www.india-forum.com/articles/170/1/...ulty-of-Bigotry
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Kissinger, famed for his âI wanna p*ss on those Indians! Indians are all bastards, the most aggressive people on earth!â<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Do Kamal Nath, Montek and Chidambaram want to be urinated on at lunch? Possibly. Perhaps they'd even consider it a compliment: a top US dude actually urinated on them! Ain't it all special? They'll never want to wash their clothes again...
Me, I'd never eat with any such mlechcha who was involved with terrorising Cambodians and Laotians and who sat back and let W Pukestani genocidal-terror loose on Dharmics in E Pukestan:
http://www.india-forum.com/articles/170/1/...ulty-of-Bigotry
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The Harvard professor who got paid millions for his brilliant advice, that led the US to carpet-bomb Cambodia and Laos? And to ignore the desperate pleas from the US Consulate in Dacca to stop the genocide unleashed by Yahya Khanâs West Pakistan Army?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
http://www.edwebproject.org/sideshow/history/nixon.html
"Nixon's War: The American Bombing Begins"
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The idea was pitched to Nixon, who quickly approved the bombing with the assistance of his national security advisor Henry Kissinger. The first airstrikes were set for March, barely one month after the initial intelligence reports. In honor of the breakfast meeting at the Pentagon that led to Nixon's approval of the strike, the assault was codenamed Operation Breakfast.
As suggested by Kissenger, Nixon ordered that the attacks occur in secret, and all attempts to expose the bombing should be stopped. General Wheeler informed his staff:
<i>"In the event press inquiries are received following the execution of the Breakfast Plan as to whether or not US B-52s have struck in Cambodia, US spokesman will confirm that B-52s did strike on routine missions adjacent to the Cambodian border but state that he has no details and will look into the question." (Shawcross, p22)</i>
On the 9th of March, 48 boxes - approximately 48 square miles of Cambodian territory - were carpet bombed for Breakfast.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
And here:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Yet despite the months of airstrikes, the bombings did little to curb NVA activities. On the contrary, communist forces crept further and further into Cambodia. The US bombers followed suit. Significant populations of Cambodian peasants were now at risk, though no one knows how many of them were killed during the campaign.</b> And the Khmer Rouge, previously a weak guerrilla force run by disenfranchised leftist politicians, grew in the wake of the bombings, as each attack on Cambodian land legitimized their virulent hatred of Sihanouk. They would still need more fighters and weapons if they ever wanted to rule Cambodia, but at least the bombings reinforced the Khmer Rouge's taste for violence. The war in Cambodia was escalating, spiraling out of control. (King) Sihanouk, whose greatest evidence of his mandate from heaven was that he had kept his people out of the war, no longer had the right to that claim. His days were numbered.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The above page is from the site "From Sideshow To Genocide".
http://www.edwebproject.org/sideshow/history/index.html
Trigger-happy US govt/communist murderers Khmer Rouge - quelle difference? Terroristas.
http://www.edwebproject.org/sideshow/history/end.html
"The End of Cambodia; The Beginning of a Nightmare"
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>On the morning of April 12, Ambassador John Gunther Dean and the US embassy staff boarded a series of US transport helicopters to evacuate</b> to a navy ship waiting in the Gulf of Thailand. Khmer children observing the evacuation waved to the Americans, calling out "OK, bye-bye, OK, bye-bye" to the departing embassy staff. As the helicopters departed Phnom Penh, the Khmer Rouge shelled the evacuation zone, firing mortars into the crowd watching the departure. <b>The civil war was coming to an end.</b>
Five days later, on April 17, 1975, Khmer Rouge forced marched unopposed into central Phnom Penh. At first the residents of the city celebrated - the siege was over, there would be no more fighting. <b>But within hours, the joy would turn to horror as the Khmer Rouge began to implement their barbarous plan for a utopian communist society. April 17, 1975 was Day Zero for the new Cambodia - two thousand years of Khmer history were now meaningless.</b><!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> <!--emo&:furious--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/furious.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='furious.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Eating with KKKissinger (the Hateward professor, how consistent!) - or the Khmer Rouge or hitler or mohammed or any other maniac for that matter - is kinda tasteless. When you eat with Kkkissinger, it means you approve of what happened to the Buddhists of Cambodia and the genocide of the Dharmics of E TSP.
Frankly, it's embarassing that anyone from our country should be lunching with said mlechcha. But then, them psecular Indians do so love the people who loathe them.
<b>Ironically</b>, Henry Kissinger had once said "The Indians are bastards." That was shortly before India went to war with Pakistan in 1971. "So if you ask me what about the things I said in 1971," Kissinger said at the dinner, "I now say, I am a convert," to applause.[right][snapback]73516[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
What <i>I</i> find <b>ironic</b> is that these Indians eating with him have such short memories. Guess they'll do just about anything to be accepted and fit in.
Here we go - from one of IF's main page articles itself:
http://www.india-forum.com/articles/170/1/...ulty-of-Bigotry
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Kissinger, famed for his âI wanna p*ss on those Indians! Indians are all bastards, the most aggressive people on earth!â<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Do Kamal Nath, Montek and Chidambaram want to be urinated on at lunch? Possibly. Perhaps they'd even consider it a compliment: a top US dude actually urinated on them! Ain't it all special? They'll never want to wash their clothes again...
Me, I'd never eat with any such mlechcha who was involved with terrorising Cambodians and Laotians and who sat back and let W Pukestani genocidal-terror loose on Dharmics in E Pukestan:
http://www.india-forum.com/articles/170/1/...ulty-of-Bigotry
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The Harvard professor who got paid millions for his brilliant advice, that led the US to carpet-bomb Cambodia and Laos? And to ignore the desperate pleas from the US Consulate in Dacca to stop the genocide unleashed by Yahya Khanâs West Pakistan Army?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
http://www.edwebproject.org/sideshow/history/nixon.html
"Nixon's War: The American Bombing Begins"
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The idea was pitched to Nixon, who quickly approved the bombing with the assistance of his national security advisor Henry Kissinger. The first airstrikes were set for March, barely one month after the initial intelligence reports. In honor of the breakfast meeting at the Pentagon that led to Nixon's approval of the strike, the assault was codenamed Operation Breakfast.
As suggested by Kissenger, Nixon ordered that the attacks occur in secret, and all attempts to expose the bombing should be stopped. General Wheeler informed his staff:
<i>"In the event press inquiries are received following the execution of the Breakfast Plan as to whether or not US B-52s have struck in Cambodia, US spokesman will confirm that B-52s did strike on routine missions adjacent to the Cambodian border but state that he has no details and will look into the question." (Shawcross, p22)</i>
On the 9th of March, 48 boxes - approximately 48 square miles of Cambodian territory - were carpet bombed for Breakfast.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
And here:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Yet despite the months of airstrikes, the bombings did little to curb NVA activities. On the contrary, communist forces crept further and further into Cambodia. The US bombers followed suit. Significant populations of Cambodian peasants were now at risk, though no one knows how many of them were killed during the campaign.</b> And the Khmer Rouge, previously a weak guerrilla force run by disenfranchised leftist politicians, grew in the wake of the bombings, as each attack on Cambodian land legitimized their virulent hatred of Sihanouk. They would still need more fighters and weapons if they ever wanted to rule Cambodia, but at least the bombings reinforced the Khmer Rouge's taste for violence. The war in Cambodia was escalating, spiraling out of control. (King) Sihanouk, whose greatest evidence of his mandate from heaven was that he had kept his people out of the war, no longer had the right to that claim. His days were numbered.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The above page is from the site "From Sideshow To Genocide".
http://www.edwebproject.org/sideshow/history/index.html
Trigger-happy US govt/communist murderers Khmer Rouge - quelle difference? Terroristas.
http://www.edwebproject.org/sideshow/history/end.html
"The End of Cambodia; The Beginning of a Nightmare"
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>On the morning of April 12, Ambassador John Gunther Dean and the US embassy staff boarded a series of US transport helicopters to evacuate</b> to a navy ship waiting in the Gulf of Thailand. Khmer children observing the evacuation waved to the Americans, calling out "OK, bye-bye, OK, bye-bye" to the departing embassy staff. As the helicopters departed Phnom Penh, the Khmer Rouge shelled the evacuation zone, firing mortars into the crowd watching the departure. <b>The civil war was coming to an end.</b>
Five days later, on April 17, 1975, Khmer Rouge forced marched unopposed into central Phnom Penh. At first the residents of the city celebrated - the siege was over, there would be no more fighting. <b>But within hours, the joy would turn to horror as the Khmer Rouge began to implement their barbarous plan for a utopian communist society. April 17, 1975 was Day Zero for the new Cambodia - two thousand years of Khmer history were now meaningless.</b><!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> <!--emo&:furious--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/furious.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='furious.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Eating with KKKissinger (the Hateward professor, how consistent!) - or the Khmer Rouge or hitler or mohammed or any other maniac for that matter - is kinda tasteless. When you eat with Kkkissinger, it means you approve of what happened to the Buddhists of Cambodia and the genocide of the Dharmics of E TSP.
Frankly, it's embarassing that anyone from our country should be lunching with said mlechcha. But then, them psecular Indians do so love the people who loathe them.