Islamism - 7

[Guest]

That led me to this old bit of news:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/017278.php
<b>UK Muslims condemn terrorism, sort of</b>
Good dissection of what <i>exactly</i> the islamis declared after the Glasgow bomb thing.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Islam forbids the killing of <i>innocent</i> people. We reject any heinous attempts to link such abhorrent acts to the teachings of Islam.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
"Innocent people." How, then, does this declaration do <i>anything</i> to refute the views of the British jihadist Anjem Choudary, who has said forthrightly on British TV that no non-Muslims are innocent? Anjem Choudary would have no trouble agreeing to this statement. And there's your problem.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Islamis are as good as the Vatican in saying things that, on the face of it, appear to have a pleasant meaning until you reread it properly...
And I did so enjoy how even muslims - who do the same themselves, so they <i>ought</i> to have recognised it a mile off - were swept away by Pope Ratty's "I am sorry you muslims were offended" vs what the gullibles amongst them imagined they heard ('I am sorry for having offended you').