Christian Subversion And Missionary Activities - 3

Husky · (This post was last modified: 10-22-2007, 08:52 AM by Husky.)

And the inevitable has eventually come:
Dinesh D'Sauce has come out with a book called "What's so great about christianity". Tadaaa.

From his web site:
www.dineshdsouza.com/
QUOTEWHAT OTHERS ARE SAYING ABOUT
WHAT'S SO GREAT ABOUT CHRISTIANITY

âResponding to the current epidemic of atheist manifestos, Dinesh DâSouza applies just the right balm for the troubled soul. Assembling arguments from history, philosophy, theology, and scienceâyes, science!âhe builds a modern and compelling case for faith in a loving God. If youâre seeking the truth about God, the universe, and the meaning of life, this is a great place to look.â

â Francis Collins, director of The Human Genome InstituteThe director of the Human Genome institute is a christian who eagerly laps up the ramblings of ignorant The Sauce? Great.
What a title for Sauce's book. Not at all predictable after his "What's so great about America"...

The same "What's so great about America" which contained that glorious puddle that was "Two Cheers for Colonialism: How the West Prevailed".

In case you haven't read that priceless rewrite of history, you should. Nauseatingly entertaining (keyword being nauseating), Saucy the "I wrote it, so can I please become white now" bootlicker shows exactly how woefully ignorant of history the average literate Indian christian is (the illiteratis hopefully aren't worse off...).

Found this: an American drooling happily all over The Sauce's dawaganda. He found an Indian thumbing-up colonialism - can there be anyone more reliable/believable to make that point than an Indian (or an African, I suppose)? Thanks to Saucy, past western 'mishaps' can from now on be described as more glories in the western crown!
The eager applaudist has ignored the fine print however, which states that Dinesh Saucepan is a christian. And as any non-European christian is always an individual conditioned to love his christian colonial masters, one can in fact expect no less from Sauce either. But that's a little detail this American conveniently overlooks when ecstaticly waving said Sauce's apologia for christian-colonial terrorism:
www.r21online.com/2002/06/two-cheers-for-colonialism.html
QUOTETwo cheers for colonialism
A fascinating article by Dinesh D'Souza challenging many of our commonly held assumptions. I view it as essential reading and encourage readers to buy his latest book, "What's So Great About America." If you would like to meet Dinesh, RSVP for a reception for him starting at 6pm on July 16th at the Stanford Park Hotel. Excerpt from the article:
(Clever WASPies: first colonise countries and colonise the minds of the converted. Then, after christocolonialism is finally seen for what it is - that is, identified as christian terrorism - bring your native christian puppets out to exhonerate the colonial era! And feed their regurgitation back to the WASPies of the next generation, so these don't feel all downcast and bad about unimportant things like historical facts.
"It was for their own good". <- Hey, that's what them southern christians also said about the gawd-given institution of slavery. The christolies never change, nor does the christotune.
But Africans haven't birthed a christian turncoat that argued that slavery was good for them ... or at least, I haven't come across one. But we have The Sauce. And like a good christian, he's already written about how Slavery benefitted the Africans.)

My conclusion is that against their intentions the colonialists brought things to India that have immeasurably enriched the lives of the descendants of colonialism. It is doubtful that non-Western countries would have acquired these good things by themselves. It was the British who, applying a universal notion of human rights, in the early nineteenth century abolished the ancient Indian institution of sati-the custom of tossing widows on the funeral pyre of their dead husbands. There is no reason to believe that the Indians, who had practiced sati for centuries, would have reached such a conclusion on their own. Imagine an African or Indian king encountering the works of Locke or Madison and saying, "You know, I think those fellows have a good point. I should relinquish my power and let my people decide whether they want me or someone else to rule." Somehow, I don't see this as likely.
Colonialism was the transmission belt that brought to Asia, Africa, and South America the blessings of Western civilization. Many of those cultures continue to have serious problems of tyranny, tribal and religious conflict, poverty, and underdevelopment, but this is not due to an excess of Western influence but due to the fact that those countries are insufficiently Westernized. Sub-Saharan Africa, which is probably in the worst position, has been described by U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan as "a cocktail of disasters." But this is not because colonialism in Africa lasted so long but because it lasted a mere half-century. It was too short to permit Western institutions to take firm root. Consequently after their independence most African nations have retreated into a kind of tribal barbarism that can only be remedied with more Western influence, not less. Africa needs more Western capital, more technology, more rule-of-law, and more individual freedom.Oh, Saucy, saucy. So many mistakes in a short paragraph.
What's wrong with the above?
(1) Sati - was voluntary self-immolation of women (=suicide).
Cf. Christianity's murder-by-burning of women for witchcraft right up to late 19th century in Ireland.
Also compare with western civilisation tradition of performing FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION on western women into the late 19th century.
Meanwhile, at about the same time, the christobrits allegedly "championed" women's rights in India and tried to ban Sati.

(2) Christocolonial British and "universal notion of human rights".
There is no "throw up" warning on that one.
Inducing famines that claimed 25 million Indians in 100 years, executions by shooting into crowds, destruction of indigenous schools to replace with British christolies/miseducation and destruction of Indian cotton industry (so British cotton industry could take off). Long list, stopping here.

(3) More christian lying from christoliar Dinesh The throw-it-out-it's-that-bad Sauce:
"Sub-Saharan Africa, which is probably in the worst position, has been described by U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan as "a cocktail of disasters." But this is not because colonialism in Africa lasted so long but because it lasted a mere half-century. It was too short to permit Western institutions to take firm root. Consequently after their independence most African nations have retreated into a kind of tribal barbarism that can only be remedied with more Western influence, not less."
Ooooh, yes. We know how Goan catholic fascist Dinesh avoids mentioning his catholic master christian tyrant king of Belgium terrorising the people of the Congo via his christocolonial officers:

http://freetruth.50webs.org/A4b.htm#Congo
QUOTEIn August, 1885, King Leopold notified the signatories that his Association would henceforth be known as the "Congo Free State," and that he himself was monarch of the domain. The whole of the population of the area was thus handed over, and the cruelty and heartless exploitation of the people almost passes belief.
A population of about two millions was converted by a stroke of the pen into a nation of slaves, under the control of officials whose brutalities beggar description.
-- Christianity, Slavery and Labour, by Chapman Cohen (1931)The Sauce also writes in the sickening full version of his article (see bottom for link): "The West did not become rich and powerful through colonial oppression. "
Of course, the benign christotyrants in the Congo were really not looting:
QUOTEVillages were raided, the natives seized, and released in order to collect the ivory and rubber. Nearly fourteen million pounds' worth of goods was forced from the natives in seven years. If the people refused or rebelled, or failed to bring in what was required, punishment--death or mutilation, or death and mutilation--followed.QUOTEThe native troops employed proved their zeal in bringing back to their officers the severed hands of those who had been murdered--in one case 160 hands, in other cases fifty or eighty. This, said our own Consul, was not the native custom; it was "the deliberate act of the soldiers of a European administration...obeying the positive orders of their superiors." The photographs published in Mark Twain's book of the children so treated place the fact of the mutilations beyond doubt.
...
Whole districts were depopulated. Of eight villages with a population of over 3,000, only ten persons were left. Of another district the population dropped in fifteen years from 50,000 to 5,000. The Bolangi tribe, formerly numbering 40,000 sank to 8,000. King Leopold, it is calculated, netted a profit of between three and five millions sterling, and could call God to witness the purity of his motives and his desire to promote civilisation.

[...]
The Roman Catholic missionaries were altogether silent until 1903 - was not Leopold a devout Catholic? And when Mr. Morel visited the United States of America in 1904 to ventilate the Congo horror, he was bitterly opposed by Cardinal Gibbon, the leading Catholic ecclesiastic in the United States.
-- Christianity, Slavery and Labour, by Chapman Cohen (1931)Guardian newspaper:
QUOTEKing Leopold, who never set foot in the Congo, controlled the vast country as his personal colony from 1885 to 1908, when it was handed over to Belgian government rule.
During those decades his agents enslaved its people to harvest rubber, beating workers with a hippo-hide whip known as the chicotte and severing the hands of men, women and children who failed to meet their quotas.

As many as 10 million Congolese are estimated to have died as a result of executions, unfamiliar diseases and hunger.So the results of colonial rule from 1885 to 1908: christians murdered 10 million Congolese while netting millions of pounds! I have seen the light! Christian civilisation is great. I bow down now. Everything I said was wrong, obviously. Dinesh The Saucepan has totally convinced me of the virtues of christocolonialism, with his indomitable way of 'viewing' history in the good-old christoislamicommunist fashion of lying and obscuring facts.

Oh wait, perhaps the Saucepan hasn't heard of actual non-fiction writers (as opposed to liars like himself), who write based on historical facts. Such as:
"Costly blessing - Christian mission and colonialism " (Teurer Segen - Christliche Mission und Kolonialismus) by Gert von Paczensky
http://freetruth.50webs.org/A4e.htm#MissionsColonialism
QUOTEMissions were in league with colonialism, often even gruesomely so. They helped to destroy old cultures, to uproot people, to divide families and entire populations. They supported and approved of a system that let countless of millions in three continents be reduced to poverty, bringing them hunger and sickness. In the misdevelopment of Latin America, Africa and Asia - the major problem in the present - missionaries and Churches of all persuasions and confessions (denominations) were complicit.
I hope Dinesh and likeminded may partake in the actual "joys" of being colonized - the same kind that he tried to overwrite with his christolies. Oh, he won't mind the experience. He's been singing its praises, after all. And though a little trepidatious initially of what may be in store for Dinesh if his wish comes true, I should learn not to mind either. He's so callous of so many (dead) people's real experiences that he doesn't give a hoot about negating them, so why should I care about him.

Links:
- chronicle.com/free/v48/i35/35b00701.htm - full version of Sauce's "Two cheers for colonialism". Have a bucket ready next to you. No warning is enough.
- That's just one chapter of his book "What's so great about America".
Look at the chapter titles here:
www.dineshdsouza.com/books/america-toc.html
- www.dineshdsouza.com/books/america-jacket.html
Where he writes this hilarity:
QUOTEWhat are some of the alleged sins of America and the West?
Slavery? But the West is unique not in having slavery but in abolishing it.Ummm. Ancient Rome (=non-christian) nearly abolished it, but then came christianity and instituted it in full force.
India hadn't had it since an even longer time (that's assuming it ever had real slavery).
Meanwhile, the christos of America tried their very best to keep slavery for as long as they could. But Thomas Paine and others' ideas beat them.

Criticisms of Sauce's nonsense:
- chronicle.com/subscribe/login?url=/weekly/v48/i40/40b00402.htm
Someone who wrote back to chronicle about their previous publication with Saucepan's christo-apologetic lies
- asuph.wordpress.com/2004/10/21/four-cheers-for-the-colonialized/
- www.redcritique.org/MayJune02/TextandClass/dsouzaandthenarcosisofhistory.htm
(Iranian communists critiquing Sauce's garbage.)

If you wanted more proof as to why never to believe a word by christoliar The Sauce:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/014860.php
QUOTEDinesh D'Souza: "Itâs foolish to blame Islam when Islam has been around for 1,300 years and Islamic terrorism has been a problem for the past 25 years"Another cigar for Dinesh. What an accomplishment. Liar is his middlename.
Robert Spencer at Jhadwatch gives a few pointers as to what's wrong with Sauce's insupportable claim. Not enough pointers, IMO.
And also:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/015537.php
QUOTEDinesh D'Souza descends into the gutter

Login




Remember me Lost Password?