<span style='color:red'>URGENT: Change Of Address For Petitions </span>
Is this a committee or a joke? First they gave no e-mail address, or fax, or website to receive digital or at least electronic submissions, then they gave such short notice, and now this:
Last week, The Committee of Eminent Persons has changed its address to receive the petitions, objections and suggestions from the concerned people.
People are requested to send their letters at the new address which is:
<b>Member Secretary,
Committee of Eminent Persons on Sethu Samudram Shipping Channel Project,
MALLIGAI, No. 30/95, P.S. KUMARASAMY RAJA (GREENWAYS) ROAD,
Chennai - 600 028. India
Tel No. : 044-24959005, 24959006</b>
Those who had written at the old address are requested to kindly consider resending the letter at the new address.
Please also consider copying the submission to the following, so that a repository of submissions can be maintained for future purposes.
- Dr. S Kalyanaraman at his e-mail: kalyan97 at gmail dot com
- ramasetu at yahoo dot com
=============
Meanwhile, notice the members:
S. Ramachandran,
M. Sakthivel,
Dilip K. Biswas,
J.R.B. Alfred
Above derive direct benefits from the Sethusamudram Corporation as members of Environmental Monitoring Committee of the project;
RK Jain is a Govt. employee working in Indian Ports Association which is a society reporting to the Min. of Shipping;
S.R. Wate is an employee of NEERI which had a contract with Sethusamudram Corporation and Govt. of India;
P. Jagadeesan is a member of Tamilnadu State Planning Commission;
All of the above,being Govt employees can not go against its bidding.
RS Sharma,
K Paddayya and
Y. Vaikuntham
Above are declared and time-tested Marxist ideologues with pronounced anti-hindu bias.
Plus:
The committee has not included experts such as:
(i) Geology expert and (ii)oceanographic expert (iii) Tusanmi expert (iv) marine expert (v) security expert (vi) nautical expert (vii) Legal expert in the felid of law of sea (viii) Marine Archeological expert.
Owing to this, S. Swamy went to the special notice of the SC. SC disowned the committee saying SC had not constituded the said committee and therefore was not interested in hearing whether it was biased or not.
Dr. S. Swamy says:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->October 24, 2007
PRESS RELEASE
The Supreme Court's First Bench consisting of Chief Justice K.Balakrishnan, Judges Raveedran and Dalbir Bhandari today disowned the Committee of Eminent Persons, appointed by the Government of India in the Sethusamudram Canal Project matter, which committee is to suggest a new counter affidavit to be filed iby the government in the Supreme Court by mid-December. The CJI observed that the apexcourt did not constitute the said committee and therefore is not interested whether it is biased or not. The CJI further observed that when the matter comes up in January 2008, I would beat liberty to raise all objections to the Committee at that stage before the Court if the Government relies on the committee'sreport.
I had in my Interlocutory Applicationsaid that the Committee was biased and rigged, and since it's formation was announced by the Additional Solicitor General in Court, direction ought to be given by the Bench to quash the present committee and a new unbiased committee should be set up.
(SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY)
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Is this a committee or a joke? First they gave no e-mail address, or fax, or website to receive digital or at least electronic submissions, then they gave such short notice, and now this:
Last week, The Committee of Eminent Persons has changed its address to receive the petitions, objections and suggestions from the concerned people.
People are requested to send their letters at the new address which is:
<b>Member Secretary,
Committee of Eminent Persons on Sethu Samudram Shipping Channel Project,
MALLIGAI, No. 30/95, P.S. KUMARASAMY RAJA (GREENWAYS) ROAD,
Chennai - 600 028. India
Tel No. : 044-24959005, 24959006</b>
Those who had written at the old address are requested to kindly consider resending the letter at the new address.
Please also consider copying the submission to the following, so that a repository of submissions can be maintained for future purposes.
- Dr. S Kalyanaraman at his e-mail: kalyan97 at gmail dot com
- ramasetu at yahoo dot com
=============
Meanwhile, notice the members:
S. Ramachandran,
M. Sakthivel,
Dilip K. Biswas,
J.R.B. Alfred
Above derive direct benefits from the Sethusamudram Corporation as members of Environmental Monitoring Committee of the project;
RK Jain is a Govt. employee working in Indian Ports Association which is a society reporting to the Min. of Shipping;
S.R. Wate is an employee of NEERI which had a contract with Sethusamudram Corporation and Govt. of India;
P. Jagadeesan is a member of Tamilnadu State Planning Commission;
All of the above,being Govt employees can not go against its bidding.
RS Sharma,
K Paddayya and
Y. Vaikuntham
Above are declared and time-tested Marxist ideologues with pronounced anti-hindu bias.
Plus:
The committee has not included experts such as:
(i) Geology expert and (ii)oceanographic expert (iii) Tusanmi expert (iv) marine expert (v) security expert (vi) nautical expert (vii) Legal expert in the felid of law of sea (viii) Marine Archeological expert.
Owing to this, S. Swamy went to the special notice of the SC. SC disowned the committee saying SC had not constituded the said committee and therefore was not interested in hearing whether it was biased or not.
Dr. S. Swamy says:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->October 24, 2007
PRESS RELEASE
The Supreme Court's First Bench consisting of Chief Justice K.Balakrishnan, Judges Raveedran and Dalbir Bhandari today disowned the Committee of Eminent Persons, appointed by the Government of India in the Sethusamudram Canal Project matter, which committee is to suggest a new counter affidavit to be filed iby the government in the Supreme Court by mid-December. The CJI observed that the apexcourt did not constitute the said committee and therefore is not interested whether it is biased or not. The CJI further observed that when the matter comes up in January 2008, I would beat liberty to raise all objections to the Committee at that stage before the Court if the Government relies on the committee'sreport.
I had in my Interlocutory Applicationsaid that the Committee was biased and rigged, and since it's formation was announced by the Additional Solicitor General in Court, direction ought to be given by the Bench to quash the present committee and a new unbiased committee should be set up.
(SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY)
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->