Sankara, about your #182
Was there really ever a court-case by some Polish nun against ISKCON for such reasons:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->a nun filed a case before a Judicial Magistrate praying that ISKCON should be banned because itâs followers are glorifying a Character called Krishna âWho was loose in morals, having married 16,000 Gopikasâ.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Seems a bit too unbelievable IMO, although it is not beyond the realm of possibility I suppose. But the whole thing seems to be very much like a story (that is, it perfectly follows the formula beginning-middle-end/problem-climax-resolution).
I'm not doubting you or HK, but did HK do a doublecheck on this 'incident' they were given? There are no names and dates (nun, ISKCON person, judge - all nameless), no exact location.
Was there really ever a court-case by some Polish nun against ISKCON for such reasons:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->a nun filed a case before a Judicial Magistrate praying that ISKCON should be banned because itâs followers are glorifying a Character called Krishna âWho was loose in morals, having married 16,000 Gopikasâ.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Seems a bit too unbelievable IMO, although it is not beyond the realm of possibility I suppose. But the whole thing seems to be very much like a story (that is, it perfectly follows the formula beginning-middle-end/problem-climax-resolution).
I'm not doubting you or HK, but did HK do a doublecheck on this 'incident' they were given? There are no names and dates (nun, ISKCON person, judge - all nameless), no exact location.