11-19-2007, 10:04 PM
<b>Why Gowda pulled the BJP government down: The inside story</b><!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Observers who have been watching the events of the last few months said that, left alone, Gowda would definitely have pulled the BJP down, but he would have given them at least six months in power.
Intense pressure from his family, especially his third son Revanna, was too much for him.
Revanna, it is said, had nurtured chief ministerial ambitions, and was miffed with Gowda for extending support to the BJP.
According to Revanna's coterie, since Kumaraswamy (who is incidentally is the youngest of Gowda's four sons) had been given a shot at power and the same would be extended to Revanna too.
<b>Had Gowda not given into the demands of Revanna, there was every chance that the latter would have split both the party and the family. Gowda not only had to put up with the Revanna's demands, but also had to give into the demands of Revanna's wife Bhavani. It is said that Bhavani would soon join the party and contest from the K R Pet constituency in Mandya. Both husband and wife had pressurised Gowda right from the beginning when a decision to make Kumaraswamy the deputy chief minister was taken</b>. Revanna's supporters felt Gowda was giving away too much to Kumaraswamy.
To fulfill Revanna's dream, Gowda now intends to join hands with the Congress and form a government. If this works out, Gowda will push the Congress into agreeing to make Revanna the chief minister.
Preliminary talks between the two parties reveal that Revanna would be made chief minister, while senior Congress leader Parameshwar will be the deputy chief minister.
Apart from the Revanna factor, sources say the allocation of key portfolios was also a reason for Monday's drama. Yeddyurappa maintained that the <b>only reason for Gowda to issue the whip was because he wanted both urban development and the mining and geology portfolios</b>. Yeddyurappa said all the other excuses are lame in nature. He questioned,<b> "What is so lucrative about these portfolios? Why are they insisting on these two portfolios?"</b>
............
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<b>Karnataka governor recommends President's rule</b>
Intense pressure from his family, especially his third son Revanna, was too much for him.
Revanna, it is said, had nurtured chief ministerial ambitions, and was miffed with Gowda for extending support to the BJP.
According to Revanna's coterie, since Kumaraswamy (who is incidentally is the youngest of Gowda's four sons) had been given a shot at power and the same would be extended to Revanna too.
<b>Had Gowda not given into the demands of Revanna, there was every chance that the latter would have split both the party and the family. Gowda not only had to put up with the Revanna's demands, but also had to give into the demands of Revanna's wife Bhavani. It is said that Bhavani would soon join the party and contest from the K R Pet constituency in Mandya. Both husband and wife had pressurised Gowda right from the beginning when a decision to make Kumaraswamy the deputy chief minister was taken</b>. Revanna's supporters felt Gowda was giving away too much to Kumaraswamy.
To fulfill Revanna's dream, Gowda now intends to join hands with the Congress and form a government. If this works out, Gowda will push the Congress into agreeing to make Revanna the chief minister.
Preliminary talks between the two parties reveal that Revanna would be made chief minister, while senior Congress leader Parameshwar will be the deputy chief minister.
Apart from the Revanna factor, sources say the allocation of key portfolios was also a reason for Monday's drama. Yeddyurappa maintained that the <b>only reason for Gowda to issue the whip was because he wanted both urban development and the mining and geology portfolios</b>. Yeddyurappa said all the other excuses are lame in nature. He questioned,<b> "What is so lucrative about these portfolios? Why are they insisting on these two portfolios?"</b>
............
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<b>Karnataka governor recommends President's rule</b>