<!--QuoteBegin-Mudy+Nov 23 2007, 12:11 AM-->QUOTE(Mudy @ Nov 23 2007, 12:11 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Yesterday, watched this movie, well made movie, but they had skipped lot of nonsense by UN, EU and Church. I have seen documentary which was very violent and more detailed.Â
Worth to note -
Belgium divide/identified tribe based on nose length and facial features and before leaving gave power to minority/Hutu. Later provided weapons for genocide.
[right][snapback]75522[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->I think the minority were Tutsis. But both Tutsis and Hutus were cruelly used by christoterrorism (colonial christoterrorists).
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->(Hotel Rwanda) had skipped lot of nonsense by UN, EU and Church<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->It's why I will never watch such sham movies that won't dare spell out what killed the poor Rwandans or Native Americans or others.
Hutus were also murdered even in the original genocide, but its main target population was Tutsis who were largely the victims.
I think Rwanda has been described as more than genocide ('ethnocide' being the wrong term as they turn out to have been the same ethnicity all along): it's also been referred to as gendercide, because a particularly large number of men of both subcommunities were targeted. This gendercide view includes not only the initial anti-Tutsi genocide but also subsequent anti-Hutu massacres. The bloody revenge-and-counter-revenge cycle was all founded on the usual christoterrorist fictions.
Yet the real villain of christoterrorism is alive and well, and no one has brought it to justice or dared to accuse it. Everything regarding christoislamism has been the greatest coverup in history. It remains free to keep violating human rights again and again.
Rwandans should take REAL revenge by bringing down the thing that truly killed them, christoislamism (they should expose it forever, by taking christianity to an international human rights/warcrimes/crimes against humanity tribunal).
Worth to note -
Belgium divide/identified tribe based on nose length and facial features and before leaving gave power to minority/Hutu. Later provided weapons for genocide.
[right][snapback]75522[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->I think the minority were Tutsis. But both Tutsis and Hutus were cruelly used by christoterrorism (colonial christoterrorists).
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->(Hotel Rwanda) had skipped lot of nonsense by UN, EU and Church<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->It's why I will never watch such sham movies that won't dare spell out what killed the poor Rwandans or Native Americans or others.
Hutus were also murdered even in the original genocide, but its main target population was Tutsis who were largely the victims.
I think Rwanda has been described as more than genocide ('ethnocide' being the wrong term as they turn out to have been the same ethnicity all along): it's also been referred to as gendercide, because a particularly large number of men of both subcommunities were targeted. This gendercide view includes not only the initial anti-Tutsi genocide but also subsequent anti-Hutu massacres. The bloody revenge-and-counter-revenge cycle was all founded on the usual christoterrorist fictions.
Yet the real villain of christoterrorism is alive and well, and no one has brought it to justice or dared to accuse it. Everything regarding christoislamism has been the greatest coverup in history. It remains free to keep violating human rights again and again.
Rwandans should take REAL revenge by bringing down the thing that truly killed them, christoislamism (they should expose it forever, by taking christianity to an international human rights/warcrimes/crimes against humanity tribunal).