<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->RodephEmet
The popular academics who specialize in Christian study try to prove the New Testament's veracity by showing how it fits in with the Old Testament(Brown, et al)Â <b>But most scholars don't know that the Old Testament was created in order to retrofit with the New Testament. That is the primary reason that the Romans burned the torahs.</b>
People don't take Jewish scholars seriously who have explored this area. They dismiss Abelard Reuchlin's work and are afraid to be put into his category of scholarship. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Back projection is very evident in British manipulation of Sikh traditions. Originally formulated as a sword arm of the natives, we can notice the hindu elements at every turn, just as we can notice the imprints of elohim (plural !!!) and baal in the jewish scripture. A monotheistic struggle of a line of iconoclastic Prophet/Gurus was back projected onto the authentic history.
The popular academics who specialize in Christian study try to prove the New Testament's veracity by showing how it fits in with the Old Testament(Brown, et al)Â <b>But most scholars don't know that the Old Testament was created in order to retrofit with the New Testament. That is the primary reason that the Romans burned the torahs.</b>
People don't take Jewish scholars seriously who have explored this area. They dismiss Abelard Reuchlin's work and are afraid to be put into his category of scholarship. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Back projection is very evident in British manipulation of Sikh traditions. Originally formulated as a sword arm of the natives, we can notice the hindu elements at every turn, just as we can notice the imprints of elohim (plural !!!) and baal in the jewish scripture. A monotheistic struggle of a line of iconoclastic Prophet/Gurus was back projected onto the authentic history.