01-17-2008, 05:14 AM
Is anybody following the SF Zoo tiger attack which killed one and injured two people? the two people are turning out to be two brothers named Dhaliwal. The media is making out as if they deserved the attack as they think the victims provoked the tiger. Lost in this media campaign is the fact that the zoo did not have adequate protection for its visitors. Saying the victims had taunted the tiger begs the question how did the tiger maul the victims from a safe enclosure evenif they taunted it?
And what would the media response be if the victims were more mainstream?
And what would the media response be if the victims were more mainstream?