Christian Subversion And Missionary Activities - 3

[Husky]

Concerning posts 158 to 174 where member SwamyG asked in his #158 the following:
<!--QuoteBegin-SwamyG+Oct 16 2007, 10:20 PM-->QUOTE(SwamyG @ Oct 16 2007, 10:20 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->[...]
So what is wrong if somebody preaches and offers material benefits and in exchange people convert to the religion? Thinking 1:1, preacher vs the to-be-converted (or just-converted family), the preacher preaches with an agenda to convert and in the process temporarily reduces the plight of the to-be-converted, what is wrong?
[right][snapback]74326[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->K.Ram's post 358 just above is an example that will illustrate why conversion of even one person to christoislamism becomes a threat to the continued existence of the traditions and of peace among the unconverted, free natural religionists. In some cases, converts are a threat to a free person's life (as in the case of the Orissa Swami).

In this case we can see how just one person possessed by christianism (=terrorism) is terrorising 500 others:
The christoterrorist stephen can't live and let live now that he has converted even though he has his own church (and more are always coming up) where he can pray to his biblical god freely. Oh No. He WILL insist on his right to exercise christo-intolerance - as specifically demanded of him in his bible -- towards other religions and towards others' Gods by preventing 500 Hindus from having access to their own Temple.

One christoterrorist will not rest against the biblical offence of Hindus worshipping 'other Gods', but will go out of his way to get a 'heathen' temple demolished in a street he doesn't even visit:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>‘While 500 families want this temple for worship, one family is against it,’ he said and added that M Stephen, a resident has been behind all overt and covert efforts to remove the temple from this place.</b>

While other residents endorsed his view, V Kumar and P Sundar, who are at the forefront of the fight alleged that a court direction was obtained by Stephen after telling the court that the local residents themselves had wanted the removal of the temple.
[.....]
Womenfolk of the locality, who run a self-help group explained that their (MC Garden 4th lane) <b>street is a dead-end and that residents alone use it.</b>

The temple is situated here and no one residing here had complained against it.

<b>Stephen is a resident of neighbouring Velayudha Pandian Street and he does not use this street. </b>

<b>Only he has been objecting to the Pillayar temple.</b> ‘He is using unfair and unjust means to remove the temple,’ they said in a chorus and alleged that <b>Stephen has also been speaking in a derogatory manner about worship of Ganesa for a long time.</b>

Residents claimed that <b>Stephen is an employee of the Intelligence Bureau</b> and alleged that he has been <b>misusing his official position to exert pressure on corporation and police authorities to demolish the temple.</b><!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->