Indian establishment consists of chapprasi singh and his madame and similar characters; naturally they will have affinity for hard handed crackdown on Tibetan traditions- it reminds them of those Hindus. Westerners as usual are fork-tongued. They show a little squirming for Tibet since it is fashionable to do so. They are like the dandy Gere who prances around singing paeans to Tibetans but does not hesistate to give lecture and other dandy lines on "Hindu fundamentalists". Tibet is fashionable, Nepal is not. Buddhism is fashionable, Hindusim is not. At most it is just a game and time pass for them. they heve theor geopolitical goals as well.
The "Indian establishment" follows the diktats of their paymasters and mental masters. If you're a d'souza you will lean towards the Missionaries. If you're an Arundhati, you will copy your behavior from Witzel, Nussbaum, Marx, and Albright. If you're a Yechury, you will follow diktat from China. Sardar Patel types are no where in sight.
The "Indian establishment" follows the diktats of their paymasters and mental masters. If you're a d'souza you will lean towards the Missionaries. If you're an Arundhati, you will copy your behavior from Witzel, Nussbaum, Marx, and Albright. If you're a Yechury, you will follow diktat from China. Sardar Patel types are no where in sight.