08-20-2004, 09:25 PM
rajesh_g: Read the part:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The Vishabruksham, published between 1974-76, had a cult following in the seventies and eighties when <b>Marxism was the flavour of the time</b>.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
So no surprises there eh?
Any popular books by our desi Marxists debunking non-Hindu epitomes of all virtues? At least the Chinese Marxists are truly "secular" in that respect for not being biased with respect to a particular section of non-athesits.
It's our own swadeshi version of societal Stockholm syndrome which allows such authors and books to flourish. <!--emo&<_<--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/dry.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='dry.gif' /><!--endemo-->
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The Vishabruksham, published between 1974-76, had a cult following in the seventies and eighties when <b>Marxism was the flavour of the time</b>.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
So no surprises there eh?
Any popular books by our desi Marxists debunking non-Hindu epitomes of all virtues? At least the Chinese Marxists are truly "secular" in that respect for not being biased with respect to a particular section of non-athesits.
It's our own swadeshi version of societal Stockholm syndrome which allows such authors and books to flourish. <!--emo&<_<--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/dry.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='dry.gif' /><!--endemo-->