<!--QuoteBegin-Bharatvarsh+May 11 2008, 07:38 AM-->QUOTE(Bharatvarsh @ May 11 2008, 07:38 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Since when did Turks and Moroccans become "South Asians"?
How come they didn't test the Surinamese Indians who are substantial in Netherlands but use results from North Africans and extrapolate them to Indians.
[right][snapback]81523[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Bharatavarsha, why is your reasonable sensible self expecting reason and sense from them? They belong in the category of people who did some DNA tests on occurrence of blue eyes with samples from Europe to Turkey and Jordan and found that all <i>with possibly one exception</i> had a common ancestor from the Black Sea and then concluded that "therefore all blue eyes all over the world" (including Persia, Afghanistan and India which they never even bothered testing) must have therefore come from the same Black Sea ancestor. And that's in spite of that one question-mark they themselves had discovered in their own insufficient sample.
It is only natural that you fail to understand their logic and their pretences to scientific methodology.
How come they didn't test the Surinamese Indians who are substantial in Netherlands but use results from North Africans and extrapolate them to Indians.
[right][snapback]81523[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Bharatavarsha, why is your reasonable sensible self expecting reason and sense from them? They belong in the category of people who did some DNA tests on occurrence of blue eyes with samples from Europe to Turkey and Jordan and found that all <i>with possibly one exception</i> had a common ancestor from the Black Sea and then concluded that "therefore all blue eyes all over the world" (including Persia, Afghanistan and India which they never even bothered testing) must have therefore come from the same Black Sea ancestor. And that's in spite of that one question-mark they themselves had discovered in their own insufficient sample.
It is only natural that you fail to understand their logic and their pretences to scientific methodology.