Bharatavarsha's post above is a must read.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Speaking of being armed<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->You beat me to it! (I'll leave the para I have written somewhere below as is though.) I was going to link to Hinduwisdom.info where I'd read how the christoBritish made Hindus defenseless.
Thanks for that quoteblock from VoiceOfDharma, that is just deeply cool. I'd never read that before.
1. RSS is a volunteer organisation. They're Indians' best bet in cases of tsunami and natural disasters. Unlike the racist Amerikkkan government that ignored the victims of the Katrina hurricane and made a show of incapacity, RSS helped lots of Indian victims of the massive Tsunami which struck the southeastern Asian region some years back.
Like a typical Hindu organisation, RSS helped victims without regard to their religion and did not ask for nor expect people to convert to Hinduism. (The christian terrorist agencies were documented in the media for refusing aid when victims did not agree to convert.)
2. Sandhya Jain and her sister Meenakshi Jain are both Jains. I would say they show remarkable efficacy, integrity and bravery (some of the many Kshatriya qualities) in combating christoislamicommunism and have achieved more with the pen than many would by randomly swinging some big weapon around. Buddhists in E Asia at least have never been incompetent, but have stressed self-defense. It is sad that when many Kshatriyas in India took up Buddhism long ago they decided (unlike their E Asian counterparts) that Ahimsa was the only right thing, in <i>all circumstances without exception</i>. They ended up paying the price for their misconception, since the islamics murdered most Indian Buddhists, while those that survived have long since fled to Tibet, Nepal and Sri Lanka.
And as far as Sri Lanka today is concerned, the Buddhists there are certainly not pacifist by any stretch of the imagination.
3. LTTE is ultra-violent because it is driven by christianism's thirst for others' blood; its leaders are christian. LTTE dupes Hindus into thinking it represents them. Why is it that Hindus in Sri Lanka get converted in larger numbers to christianism? Because christianism only gains converts in stressful situations, when people are desperate enough to believe christoterrorism's dubious promises of
- peace or at least protection (during war situations like in Sri Lanka, in Nigeria and Uganda; 80s Nagaland; and of course as they intend to do in Nepal in the future) and
- aid (during natural disasters like the Tsunami, and what they would like to do in Burma now).
The biggest and loudest supporters of the LTTE in SL are actually christians and not Hindus. SL Hindus are afraid of the Sinhalese government but they're also very afraid of the LTTE which forces Hindu children into the christoterrorist army where they end up dying for what are actually christoterrorist purposes. That is also why christians in India's TN support the LTTE, even while they do everything to sabotage Hinduism in TN. It's precisely because they know that LTTE's functioning in Sri Lanka is not really for Hindus' sake at all.
But if muslims in SL are scared of LTTE, then that's an accidental advantage. Some muslims in ME were afraid the European christian crusaders too. Christoislamics were always equally matched in their ferocity.
And while all the terrorism is going on, christianism is stealing ground in both Hindu and Buddhist areas in Sri Lanka, as foreign missionaries and their converts go about building their unwanted churches everywhere and preaching how christianism will bring them peace. After stoking the fires of war to the greatest extremes, it pretends it's all innocent.
4. India's problem is that we've lost most of our Kshatriyas to the murderous islamic invasions. Then there was christoBritish terrorism which banned all Hindu self defense (general bans on Hindu populace being armed, and of course the Kalaripayattu ban which targetted the martial Nairs). Then there's the modern-day psecularisation of our army who will never even consider acting on Hindu behalf but will defend secularism first and foremost; while many christos and islamics amongst them will consider working for their own ideology's purposes.
Another part of the problem is that real Brahmanas who can at least teach Hindus about various facets of Hinduism that they might not already know (such as Samskritam) or could have mounted debates against christoislamicommunistic lies, are dwindling thanks to
- the old age of real Brahmanas (many have passed away or are coming close to that age, while the next not-quite-so-old generation is comparatively less clued in);
- the stupidity and downright villainy of a significant number of their physical offspring. They're not Brahmanas of course.
The stupidity stems from ignorance. But while stupidity can be laughed at, the villainy is unforgiveable: many Bengali and Kerala communistics are of the "brahmin" community. A number of these communitwits are the lying self-proclaimed 'historians'. And of course there's the likes of Mani-"I will use cheap psecular lies to sell a terrorist movie"-Ratnam and his even more loser kid with its ideals of an (oxy)moronic communist "democratic dictatorship". These are examples of the kind of terrorist mutants produced by brahmin communities.
There are bad pseculars and christoislamicommunistics with ancestors from all Hindu communities. For instance, there is that loony crypto christian nutcase politician that has the gall to cling to the Reddy surname (until I heard about the existence of YSR, I was of the opinion that the name Reddy was a sure sign of a Hindu nationalist), so it's not like any Hindu community is so perfect that an occasional shameful monstrosity can't accidentally be birthed by it. Still, in my view, when Brahmanas' distant progeny go bad, they go unforgiveably bad. Worse than Jai Chands - who can only cause the deaths of so many people in their lifetimes and immediately thereafter - are those (communist tyrants and the eminent hysterians from the Red ranks) that, with their false rewrites of history, will make the Lie That Damns live on to kill the next generations. Apparently communism appeals with its cheap thrills - that is, with its impossible promises of quick fixes.
But of course, when a Hindu converts to christianity, islam or communism, the result is that they're not Hindu: they've converted to terrorism and can no longer claim to be Hindu. So I suppose there's really no need for Hindus to be ashamed of people who aren't their kind, but are rather specifically anti-Hindu instead.
What I said in Post #37: I don't mean the sarcastic bits of that post now. I was very angry and hence the pessimism. Pessimism does no good and it's not even of predictive value. Realism is the only way of viewing things and that's what will be useful to us.
5. I think Hindu society can save itself when it stands up as Hindu. Every Hindu should cultivate in himself all the Kshatriya qualities of bravery, nobility and learn some basic self-defense. Stick up for your fellow-Hindus. And Brahmana qualities like becoming intimately acquainted with at least some parts of the Hindu scriptures that appeal to you. Because what you know will help you defend your Hindu Dharma. And when you find that you have learnt well and can teach others, you must share. For instance, when you learn Samskritam, teach your siblings and friends, and tell them to pass it on. This is another part of pushing Hindu revival: being a teacher in the chain. Study hard and work to become wealthy so that you can then have enough to save for you and your family's future as well as for helping Hindus/Dharmics in need and helping Hindu/Dharmic causes. And finally, work hard to defend Hindu Dharma, and with your efforts add your name to the list of greats that Hindu Dharma gave rise to. More great people means more pride amongst Dharmics.
How clever of me to speak in the second rather than first person. Think I must know myself so thoroughly that even subconsciously I realised I would not exert myself to do most of what I listed above.
But I do believe in Hindus. I believe that in spite of having lost a lot of Kshatriyas, Brahmanas and knowledgeable Hindus of all professions, that Hindus in our times will come together - regardless of the lies against our Dharma and our people - and be one overall-community, united and like a wall that terrorism and its lies can't ever breach again. (I remember enough instances that led me to this conclusion during my last visit to Chennai, I should recall them more often.)
That is not to say I don't like the existence of subcommunities, were these to last - because they have glorious histories, and diversity is always an advantage as opposed to narrow-minded "melting-pot" monotony - but I believe in Hindus as <i>Hindus</i>. That our real identity is only that. (Also I am greedy and have a nasty habit of claiming all Hindus' accomplishments as being somehow my own.... For instance, when I think of the Hindu Shahiyas of Afghanistan who took on the islami attackers, I am as proud if they were my direct ancestors. And to all intents and purposes, they are - for the reason of my being Hindu, just as they were. Or when I read some great point made by another Hindu, I regard it with the same sense of ownership as if it were made by a direct sibling or me even.
I am always fully certain I have this right; it is utterly futile to try and convince me otherwise. But in this I'm not greedy at the expense of others: I believe all other Hindus have the same right to the same claim. That all Hindu accomplishments belong to <i>all</i> Hindus. (It goes without saying that I mean real Hindus: that is, the non-psecular/non-traitor kind.) And if ever I did anything clever - stop giggling and for the sake of argument let us just suppose I were to - then it is something that I mean to share with all Hindus/Dharmics. Of course I will brag about how I did it - can't help that now, can I - but it would be intended for my Dharma, for all my people.
See how that little turn toward wanting to share with others is an effect produced by Hindu Dharma, in that sharing is how I got to partake in all the goodness in the first place <!--emo&
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif' /><!--endemo--> )
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Speaking of being armed<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->You beat me to it! (I'll leave the para I have written somewhere below as is though.) I was going to link to Hinduwisdom.info where I'd read how the christoBritish made Hindus defenseless.
Thanks for that quoteblock from VoiceOfDharma, that is just deeply cool. I'd never read that before.
1. RSS is a volunteer organisation. They're Indians' best bet in cases of tsunami and natural disasters. Unlike the racist Amerikkkan government that ignored the victims of the Katrina hurricane and made a show of incapacity, RSS helped lots of Indian victims of the massive Tsunami which struck the southeastern Asian region some years back.
Like a typical Hindu organisation, RSS helped victims without regard to their religion and did not ask for nor expect people to convert to Hinduism. (The christian terrorist agencies were documented in the media for refusing aid when victims did not agree to convert.)
2. Sandhya Jain and her sister Meenakshi Jain are both Jains. I would say they show remarkable efficacy, integrity and bravery (some of the many Kshatriya qualities) in combating christoislamicommunism and have achieved more with the pen than many would by randomly swinging some big weapon around. Buddhists in E Asia at least have never been incompetent, but have stressed self-defense. It is sad that when many Kshatriyas in India took up Buddhism long ago they decided (unlike their E Asian counterparts) that Ahimsa was the only right thing, in <i>all circumstances without exception</i>. They ended up paying the price for their misconception, since the islamics murdered most Indian Buddhists, while those that survived have long since fled to Tibet, Nepal and Sri Lanka.
And as far as Sri Lanka today is concerned, the Buddhists there are certainly not pacifist by any stretch of the imagination.
3. LTTE is ultra-violent because it is driven by christianism's thirst for others' blood; its leaders are christian. LTTE dupes Hindus into thinking it represents them. Why is it that Hindus in Sri Lanka get converted in larger numbers to christianism? Because christianism only gains converts in stressful situations, when people are desperate enough to believe christoterrorism's dubious promises of
- peace or at least protection (during war situations like in Sri Lanka, in Nigeria and Uganda; 80s Nagaland; and of course as they intend to do in Nepal in the future) and
- aid (during natural disasters like the Tsunami, and what they would like to do in Burma now).
The biggest and loudest supporters of the LTTE in SL are actually christians and not Hindus. SL Hindus are afraid of the Sinhalese government but they're also very afraid of the LTTE which forces Hindu children into the christoterrorist army where they end up dying for what are actually christoterrorist purposes. That is also why christians in India's TN support the LTTE, even while they do everything to sabotage Hinduism in TN. It's precisely because they know that LTTE's functioning in Sri Lanka is not really for Hindus' sake at all.
But if muslims in SL are scared of LTTE, then that's an accidental advantage. Some muslims in ME were afraid the European christian crusaders too. Christoislamics were always equally matched in their ferocity.
And while all the terrorism is going on, christianism is stealing ground in both Hindu and Buddhist areas in Sri Lanka, as foreign missionaries and their converts go about building their unwanted churches everywhere and preaching how christianism will bring them peace. After stoking the fires of war to the greatest extremes, it pretends it's all innocent.
4. India's problem is that we've lost most of our Kshatriyas to the murderous islamic invasions. Then there was christoBritish terrorism which banned all Hindu self defense (general bans on Hindu populace being armed, and of course the Kalaripayattu ban which targetted the martial Nairs). Then there's the modern-day psecularisation of our army who will never even consider acting on Hindu behalf but will defend secularism first and foremost; while many christos and islamics amongst them will consider working for their own ideology's purposes.
Another part of the problem is that real Brahmanas who can at least teach Hindus about various facets of Hinduism that they might not already know (such as Samskritam) or could have mounted debates against christoislamicommunistic lies, are dwindling thanks to
- the old age of real Brahmanas (many have passed away or are coming close to that age, while the next not-quite-so-old generation is comparatively less clued in);
- the stupidity and downright villainy of a significant number of their physical offspring. They're not Brahmanas of course.
The stupidity stems from ignorance. But while stupidity can be laughed at, the villainy is unforgiveable: many Bengali and Kerala communistics are of the "brahmin" community. A number of these communitwits are the lying self-proclaimed 'historians'. And of course there's the likes of Mani-"I will use cheap psecular lies to sell a terrorist movie"-Ratnam and his even more loser kid with its ideals of an (oxy)moronic communist "democratic dictatorship". These are examples of the kind of terrorist mutants produced by brahmin communities.
There are bad pseculars and christoislamicommunistics with ancestors from all Hindu communities. For instance, there is that loony crypto christian nutcase politician that has the gall to cling to the Reddy surname (until I heard about the existence of YSR, I was of the opinion that the name Reddy was a sure sign of a Hindu nationalist), so it's not like any Hindu community is so perfect that an occasional shameful monstrosity can't accidentally be birthed by it. Still, in my view, when Brahmanas' distant progeny go bad, they go unforgiveably bad. Worse than Jai Chands - who can only cause the deaths of so many people in their lifetimes and immediately thereafter - are those (communist tyrants and the eminent hysterians from the Red ranks) that, with their false rewrites of history, will make the Lie That Damns live on to kill the next generations. Apparently communism appeals with its cheap thrills - that is, with its impossible promises of quick fixes.
But of course, when a Hindu converts to christianity, islam or communism, the result is that they're not Hindu: they've converted to terrorism and can no longer claim to be Hindu. So I suppose there's really no need for Hindus to be ashamed of people who aren't their kind, but are rather specifically anti-Hindu instead.
What I said in Post #37: I don't mean the sarcastic bits of that post now. I was very angry and hence the pessimism. Pessimism does no good and it's not even of predictive value. Realism is the only way of viewing things and that's what will be useful to us.
5. I think Hindu society can save itself when it stands up as Hindu. Every Hindu should cultivate in himself all the Kshatriya qualities of bravery, nobility and learn some basic self-defense. Stick up for your fellow-Hindus. And Brahmana qualities like becoming intimately acquainted with at least some parts of the Hindu scriptures that appeal to you. Because what you know will help you defend your Hindu Dharma. And when you find that you have learnt well and can teach others, you must share. For instance, when you learn Samskritam, teach your siblings and friends, and tell them to pass it on. This is another part of pushing Hindu revival: being a teacher in the chain. Study hard and work to become wealthy so that you can then have enough to save for you and your family's future as well as for helping Hindus/Dharmics in need and helping Hindu/Dharmic causes. And finally, work hard to defend Hindu Dharma, and with your efforts add your name to the list of greats that Hindu Dharma gave rise to. More great people means more pride amongst Dharmics.
How clever of me to speak in the second rather than first person. Think I must know myself so thoroughly that even subconsciously I realised I would not exert myself to do most of what I listed above.
But I do believe in Hindus. I believe that in spite of having lost a lot of Kshatriyas, Brahmanas and knowledgeable Hindus of all professions, that Hindus in our times will come together - regardless of the lies against our Dharma and our people - and be one overall-community, united and like a wall that terrorism and its lies can't ever breach again. (I remember enough instances that led me to this conclusion during my last visit to Chennai, I should recall them more often.)
That is not to say I don't like the existence of subcommunities, were these to last - because they have glorious histories, and diversity is always an advantage as opposed to narrow-minded "melting-pot" monotony - but I believe in Hindus as <i>Hindus</i>. That our real identity is only that. (Also I am greedy and have a nasty habit of claiming all Hindus' accomplishments as being somehow my own.... For instance, when I think of the Hindu Shahiyas of Afghanistan who took on the islami attackers, I am as proud if they were my direct ancestors. And to all intents and purposes, they are - for the reason of my being Hindu, just as they were. Or when I read some great point made by another Hindu, I regard it with the same sense of ownership as if it were made by a direct sibling or me even.
I am always fully certain I have this right; it is utterly futile to try and convince me otherwise. But in this I'm not greedy at the expense of others: I believe all other Hindus have the same right to the same claim. That all Hindu accomplishments belong to <i>all</i> Hindus. (It goes without saying that I mean real Hindus: that is, the non-psecular/non-traitor kind.) And if ever I did anything clever - stop giggling and for the sake of argument let us just suppose I were to - then it is something that I mean to share with all Hindus/Dharmics. Of course I will brag about how I did it - can't help that now, can I - but it would be intended for my Dharma, for all my people.
See how that little turn toward wanting to share with others is an effect produced by Hindu Dharma, in that sharing is how I got to partake in all the goodness in the first place <!--emo&
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif' /><!--endemo--> )