06-03-2008, 11:13 PM
Dr Haneef has chosen his islamic identity above being Indian.
Muslims are least profiled considering India is worst victim of Islamic terror.
The problem we are facing today are because of:
1. Politicians are NOT handing Islamic terror for Votebank, thus creating a sense of outrage.
2. Victims of terror are NOT even mourned- 711 went completely unnoticed by UPA govt and psuedo media.
3. There are VERY VERY BIASED PRO JEHADI INTELLECTUALS masquandering as "liberals" in India. People like Teesta Javed Khan Seetalvad. THEY NEVER CONDEMNED ISLAMIC TERROR.
4. There are two Islamic countries in India's border that are doing great mischief.
5. ALMOST NOBODY FROM MAINSTREAM MUSLIM COMMUNITY (like Javed Akhtar) CONDEMNED TREATMENT METED OUT TO (say) TASLIMA.
All these make Indian Muslims more ghettoized. But yes, its true, most Muslims in India are not terrorists.
Then the question is, why media, Govt donot take strong action against jehadis who are miniscule?
Muhammad of Ghazni also looked upon his numerous invasions of India as the waging of a holy war. Al' Utbi, the historian of Muhammad, describing his raids writes :
" He demolished idol temples and established Islam. He captured ...... cities, killed the polluted wretches, destroying the idolaters, and gratifying Muslims. ' He then returned home and promulgated accounts of the victories obtained for Islam. ....... and vowed that every year he would undertake a holy war against Hind " Mahommed Ghori was actuated by the same holy zeal in his invasions of India. Hasan Nizami, the historian, describes his work in the following terms :
" He purged by his sword the land of Hind from the filth of infidelity and vice, and freed the whole of that country from the thorn of God-plurality and the impurity of idol-worship, and by his royal vigour and intrepidity left not one temple standing
Taimur has in his Memoir explained what led him to invade India. He says:
" My object in the invasions of Hindustan is to lead a campaign against the infidels, to convert them to the true faith according to the command of Muhammad (on whom and his family be the blessing and peace of God), to purify the land from the defilement of misbelief and polytheism, and overthrow the temples and idols, whereby we shall be Ghazis and Mujahids, companions and soldiers of the faith before God. "
Mahommad bin Qasim's first act of religious
"The slaughtering of ' infidels' seemed to be one thing that gave Muhammad particular pleasure. In one attack on Chand Rai, in A. D. 1019, many infidels were slain or taken prisoners, and the Muslims paid no regard to booty until they had satiated themselves with the slaughter of the infidels and worshippers of the sun and fire. The historian naively adds that the elephants of the Hindu armies came to Muhammad of their own accord, leaving idols, preferring the service of the religion of Islam. "
Not infrequently, the slaughter of the Hindus gave a great setback to the indigenous culture of the Hindus, as in the conquest of Bihar by Muhammad Bakhtyar Khilji. When he took Nuddea (Bihar) the Tabaquat-i-Nasiri informs us that:
" Great plunder fell into the hands of the victors. Most of the inhabitants were Brahmins with shaven heads. They were put to death. Large number of books were found......... but none could explain their contents as all the men had been killed, the whole fort and city being a place of study. "
Muslims are least profiled considering India is worst victim of Islamic terror.
The problem we are facing today are because of:
1. Politicians are NOT handing Islamic terror for Votebank, thus creating a sense of outrage.
2. Victims of terror are NOT even mourned- 711 went completely unnoticed by UPA govt and psuedo media.
3. There are VERY VERY BIASED PRO JEHADI INTELLECTUALS masquandering as "liberals" in India. People like Teesta Javed Khan Seetalvad. THEY NEVER CONDEMNED ISLAMIC TERROR.
4. There are two Islamic countries in India's border that are doing great mischief.
5. ALMOST NOBODY FROM MAINSTREAM MUSLIM COMMUNITY (like Javed Akhtar) CONDEMNED TREATMENT METED OUT TO (say) TASLIMA.
All these make Indian Muslims more ghettoized. But yes, its true, most Muslims in India are not terrorists.
Then the question is, why media, Govt donot take strong action against jehadis who are miniscule?
Muhammad of Ghazni also looked upon his numerous invasions of India as the waging of a holy war. Al' Utbi, the historian of Muhammad, describing his raids writes :
" He demolished idol temples and established Islam. He captured ...... cities, killed the polluted wretches, destroying the idolaters, and gratifying Muslims. ' He then returned home and promulgated accounts of the victories obtained for Islam. ....... and vowed that every year he would undertake a holy war against Hind " Mahommed Ghori was actuated by the same holy zeal in his invasions of India. Hasan Nizami, the historian, describes his work in the following terms :
" He purged by his sword the land of Hind from the filth of infidelity and vice, and freed the whole of that country from the thorn of God-plurality and the impurity of idol-worship, and by his royal vigour and intrepidity left not one temple standing
Taimur has in his Memoir explained what led him to invade India. He says:
" My object in the invasions of Hindustan is to lead a campaign against the infidels, to convert them to the true faith according to the command of Muhammad (on whom and his family be the blessing and peace of God), to purify the land from the defilement of misbelief and polytheism, and overthrow the temples and idols, whereby we shall be Ghazis and Mujahids, companions and soldiers of the faith before God. "
Mahommad bin Qasim's first act of religious
"The slaughtering of ' infidels' seemed to be one thing that gave Muhammad particular pleasure. In one attack on Chand Rai, in A. D. 1019, many infidels were slain or taken prisoners, and the Muslims paid no regard to booty until they had satiated themselves with the slaughter of the infidels and worshippers of the sun and fire. The historian naively adds that the elephants of the Hindu armies came to Muhammad of their own accord, leaving idols, preferring the service of the religion of Islam. "
Not infrequently, the slaughter of the Hindus gave a great setback to the indigenous culture of the Hindus, as in the conquest of Bihar by Muhammad Bakhtyar Khilji. When he took Nuddea (Bihar) the Tabaquat-i-Nasiri informs us that:
" Great plunder fell into the hands of the victors. Most of the inhabitants were Brahmins with shaven heads. They were put to death. Large number of books were found......... but none could explain their contents as all the men had been killed, the whole fort and city being a place of study. "