06-09-2008, 06:15 PM
First of all you are not reading what I write
<i>
<b>I am saying this is a first order approximation</b></i>
South India, - TN, Kerala, Andhra, Orissa , karnataka, and goa were rarely under muslim rule
Whereas UP, bihar, bengal were centers of the sultanate
Per Andre Wink, the muslims killed 200,000 hindus each year for 500 years
The mughals, even Aurangzeb were quite humane compared to the sultanate
One of the results of the muslim massacres were that the smarter fraction of the north Indian hindus, saw what was happening and fled south
which again tilts the iq to the south
In addition, the muslim pattern was to massacre community leaders to terrorise the rest to convert and this meant that the higher iq community leaders got massacred
<i>
<b>I am saying this is a first order approximation</b></i>
South India, - TN, Kerala, Andhra, Orissa , karnataka, and goa were rarely under muslim rule
Whereas UP, bihar, bengal were centers of the sultanate
Per Andre Wink, the muslims killed 200,000 hindus each year for 500 years
The mughals, even Aurangzeb were quite humane compared to the sultanate
One of the results of the muslim massacres were that the smarter fraction of the north Indian hindus, saw what was happening and fled south
which again tilts the iq to the south
In addition, the muslim pattern was to massacre community leaders to terrorise the rest to convert and this meant that the higher iq community leaders got massacred