<!--QuoteBegin-Sauravjha+Jun 10 2008, 04:49 PM-->QUOTE(Sauravjha @ Jun 10 2008, 04:49 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Okay just to be fair ,
we must make it clear as to which form of christanity we are referring to and precisely which particular aspect of that form are we analysing. As far as I am concerned our beef is primarily with the evangelist aspect of mainstream Christianity.
[right][snapback]82623[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
We need to isolate the normative framework of Christianity to its proper western source. in order to shield the Indic narratives of Zoroastrianism and Buddhism from western appropriation, demonization, and colonial reinterpretation. This is the reason why it has been necessary to go so deep into Christian origins.
we must make it clear as to which form of christanity we are referring to and precisely which particular aspect of that form are we analysing. As far as I am concerned our beef is primarily with the evangelist aspect of mainstream Christianity.
[right][snapback]82623[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
We need to isolate the normative framework of Christianity to its proper western source. in order to shield the Indic narratives of Zoroastrianism and Buddhism from western appropriation, demonization, and colonial reinterpretation. This is the reason why it has been necessary to go so deep into Christian origins.