On the topic of post 142.
While India's christoislamiterrorists - such as christian wannabe painter FN Souza and the similarly anti-Hindu islami MF Hussain - depict the kind of repugnant things that their christoislamism clearly inspires,
here is what Hindu Dharma says about the entirely different practise of the Hindus: the ancient Dharmic Art of Painting
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Chitrasutram 43-38,39
The art of painting that bestows the four-fold objectives of human beings viz., Dharma, Artha, Kama and Moksha is best among all the arts. Houses with the display of excellent portrays are (the) abode of auspiciousness.
Chitrasutram 43-11
Picture portraying emotions such as romance, humour and peace can be painted and displayed in houses. Emotions other than these shall never be displayed in anyone's house.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The above also proves that the typically christoislamic themes portrayed by the faithful FN Souza and MF Hussain show sordid christoislamic events and emotions that "will never be displayed in any Hindu's house." Ours are abodes of auspiciousness. Being infested by christoislamism, their paintings consequently reflect their minds which have been made this disgusting by being laid to waste by christoislamism.
Sadly:
- It is obvious that FN Souza was making several different repulsive images of his own fictional mary-mother-of-jeebus. In one of them, he has painted her as a nude blue deformity - presumably she turned blue because she was holding her breath in anticipation of the never-forthcoming existence. Her hideously depicted figure may be either due to his total inability as an artist or because he secretly resents women, or so some psychologists have evaluated his disturbing condition.
- It is similarly immediately apparent to all Hindus that MF Hussain likes to depict the islamic Adam in an abhorrent display as some unrecognisable simian from islamic mythology on whose tail Khadija (Mohammed's first wife) is stuck. And in another of MF Hussain's tasteless (and rather islamically-blasphemous) images, he has Mohammed copulating with the underage (8-9 yr old) Ayesha, which, though historically accurate, may give offense to all - particularly as the act is depicted as being watched by Allah in the background. Also, he is excusing the event shown by painting the child Ayesha with what is understood as the body of a full-grown woman.
Hindus were not pleased with this unsecular behaviour of FN Souza and MF Hussain, but have found it hard to argue with them as they are only painting scenes of their own religion and are driven by the insipid and inept christoislamic presumptions to 'art'. (Maybe MF Hussain should become famous for his anti-islamic paintings in other countries...)
While India's christoislamiterrorists - such as christian wannabe painter FN Souza and the similarly anti-Hindu islami MF Hussain - depict the kind of repugnant things that their christoislamism clearly inspires,
here is what Hindu Dharma says about the entirely different practise of the Hindus: the ancient Dharmic Art of Painting
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Chitrasutram 43-38,39
The art of painting that bestows the four-fold objectives of human beings viz., Dharma, Artha, Kama and Moksha is best among all the arts. Houses with the display of excellent portrays are (the) abode of auspiciousness.
Chitrasutram 43-11
Picture portraying emotions such as romance, humour and peace can be painted and displayed in houses. Emotions other than these shall never be displayed in anyone's house.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The above also proves that the typically christoislamic themes portrayed by the faithful FN Souza and MF Hussain show sordid christoislamic events and emotions that "will never be displayed in any Hindu's house." Ours are abodes of auspiciousness. Being infested by christoislamism, their paintings consequently reflect their minds which have been made this disgusting by being laid to waste by christoislamism.
Sadly:
- It is obvious that FN Souza was making several different repulsive images of his own fictional mary-mother-of-jeebus. In one of them, he has painted her as a nude blue deformity - presumably she turned blue because she was holding her breath in anticipation of the never-forthcoming existence. Her hideously depicted figure may be either due to his total inability as an artist or because he secretly resents women, or so some psychologists have evaluated his disturbing condition.
- It is similarly immediately apparent to all Hindus that MF Hussain likes to depict the islamic Adam in an abhorrent display as some unrecognisable simian from islamic mythology on whose tail Khadija (Mohammed's first wife) is stuck. And in another of MF Hussain's tasteless (and rather islamically-blasphemous) images, he has Mohammed copulating with the underage (8-9 yr old) Ayesha, which, though historically accurate, may give offense to all - particularly as the act is depicted as being watched by Allah in the background. Also, he is excusing the event shown by painting the child Ayesha with what is understood as the body of a full-grown woman.
Hindus were not pleased with this unsecular behaviour of FN Souza and MF Hussain, but have found it hard to argue with them as they are only painting scenes of their own religion and are driven by the insipid and inept christoislamic presumptions to 'art'. (Maybe MF Hussain should become famous for his anti-islamic paintings in other countries...)