<!--QuoteBegin-Sauravjha+Jun 19 2008, 07:19 PM-->QUOTE(Sauravjha @ Jun 19 2008, 07:19 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->shows that <b>you feel</b> that the breakdown of the marriage structure is on account of <b>womens "lib"</b> .[right][snapback]83035[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->You <i>must</i> be the funniest person I've read for months. Do you specialise in <b>assumptions</b>? Or is that a role you only play here?
Oh here's another pearl - <b>Assumption</b> 2:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Okay, i think the word "syncretism" is going to make you go <b>ballistic</b> anytime now.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Hysterical. Aren't you a talent.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->In the case of some <b>invaders</b> this has worked , in the case of some others <b>(your favourite kind) </b>it hasn't been that successful.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->I have a "favourite kind of invader"? Oh wait. That's another one of your <b>assumptions</b>.
Hmmm. Seeing a pattern here. Maybe you're a one-joke kinda guy after all.
Oh here's another pearl - <b>Assumption</b> 2:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Okay, i think the word "syncretism" is going to make you go <b>ballistic</b> anytime now.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Hysterical. Aren't you a talent.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->In the case of some <b>invaders</b> this has worked , in the case of some others <b>(your favourite kind) </b>it hasn't been that successful.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->I have a "favourite kind of invader"? Oh wait. That's another one of your <b>assumptions</b>.
Hmmm. Seeing a pattern here. Maybe you're a one-joke kinda guy after all.