Just to clarify what I meant in #126 when I said that all Hindus have an equal share in all Hindus' accomplishments:
What I meant was in the sense of members of a family cutting up vegetables to go into a vegebroth. The entire vegebroth is the ultimate goal of everyone: that they can all together partake of that. No one cares how many vegetables each person put in there, since the goal is to make the broth and eat it together and for the whole family to be satisfied with it.
(If in the above we make broth=Moksha, my pathetic analogy may be more sensible than I had anticipated it could be when I cooked it up.)
In that sense alone did I mean that any Hindu's actions in serving Dharma (including Hindus' accomplishments) belong to all Hindus/Dharmics.
(I therefore did not mean 'share' as in like a grateful acknowledgement that comes at the start of someone's thesis, listing the people who helped/inspired/contributed.)
What I meant was in the sense of members of a family cutting up vegetables to go into a vegebroth. The entire vegebroth is the ultimate goal of everyone: that they can all together partake of that. No one cares how many vegetables each person put in there, since the goal is to make the broth and eat it together and for the whole family to be satisfied with it.
(If in the above we make broth=Moksha, my pathetic analogy may be more sensible than I had anticipated it could be when I cooked it up.)
In that sense alone did I mean that any Hindu's actions in serving Dharma (including Hindus' accomplishments) belong to all Hindus/Dharmics.
(I therefore did not mean 'share' as in like a grateful acknowledgement that comes at the start of someone's thesis, listing the people who helped/inspired/contributed.)