07-08-2008, 06:41 PM
Arthur Kemp is a nerdicist (aka nordicist) loser. His work is comparable in worthlessness to PN Oak. He's been refuted thoroughly by Dienekes Pontikos and others regarding his section on Portugal, Greece, and the Mediterranean in general. I also remember seeing a reply somewhere for Bharat.
http://dienekes.110mb.com/articles/kempsslander/
http://www.geocities.com/refuting_kemp/
This is a recurring theme in the study of European history, starting with the English and German historians ascribing the achievements of Ancient Greece and Rome to themselves by alleging that the ruling class of both were racially Nordic. It is nothing but indicative of a deep rooted inferiority complex. What else can you show for when your people were barbarians for hundreds of years?
http://dienekes.110mb.com/articles/kempsslander/
http://www.geocities.com/refuting_kemp/
This is a recurring theme in the study of European history, starting with the English and German historians ascribing the achievements of Ancient Greece and Rome to themselves by alleging that the ruling class of both were racially Nordic. It is nothing but indicative of a deep rooted inferiority complex. What else can you show for when your people were barbarians for hundreds of years?