07-10-2008, 07:31 PM
from Rajeev's blog
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->"truth by repeated assertion": the guy with the 2 skeletons rides again
jun 9th, 2008
the pseudo-secular insist on "proof" when it comes to the rama sethu. but they happily support christist mythology. there is no "proof" that this thomas blighter ever arrived in india, or that he established churches, or that he converted nambudiris.
the simple matter is that
a) there were no nambudiris in kerala in 52 ce, as the place was buddhist/jain then
b) thomas died in ortona, italy, as certified by the vatican itself
c) ratzy himself said thomas's arrival in south india was a myth
d) even if thomas had arrived in kerala, and there were nambudiris there, they would have been completely insane to listen to the rantings of a barbarian shouting insanities ("ye children of serpents" etc.). let us remember than in 52 ce, paul had barely managed to make up the jesus hoax, and the christists had no money. so a guy waving "mutilated-corpse-of-dead-arab-stuck-on-a-stick" was not even possible then, and if he were, he would have been laughed at
e) the portuguese were the ones who conveniently conflated the story of thomas of cana, a refugee fleeing i think chrisitist bigots around 345 ce after the council of nicae and was given refuge in india (that was pretty dumb in hindsight) and the fictitious 'saint' thomas
f) the 'saint' thomas is truly miraculous: he has left 2 skeletons, one as a young man in chennai, and one as an old man in ortona, italy
lies, lies and more lies.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--emo&:roll--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/ROTFL.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='ROTFL.gif' /><!--endemo-->
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->"truth by repeated assertion": the guy with the 2 skeletons rides again
jun 9th, 2008
the pseudo-secular insist on "proof" when it comes to the rama sethu. but they happily support christist mythology. there is no "proof" that this thomas blighter ever arrived in india, or that he established churches, or that he converted nambudiris.
the simple matter is that
a) there were no nambudiris in kerala in 52 ce, as the place was buddhist/jain then
b) thomas died in ortona, italy, as certified by the vatican itself
c) ratzy himself said thomas's arrival in south india was a myth
d) even if thomas had arrived in kerala, and there were nambudiris there, they would have been completely insane to listen to the rantings of a barbarian shouting insanities ("ye children of serpents" etc.). let us remember than in 52 ce, paul had barely managed to make up the jesus hoax, and the christists had no money. so a guy waving "mutilated-corpse-of-dead-arab-stuck-on-a-stick" was not even possible then, and if he were, he would have been laughed at
e) the portuguese were the ones who conveniently conflated the story of thomas of cana, a refugee fleeing i think chrisitist bigots around 345 ce after the council of nicae and was given refuge in india (that was pretty dumb in hindsight) and the fictitious 'saint' thomas
f) the 'saint' thomas is truly miraculous: he has left 2 skeletons, one as a young man in chennai, and one as an old man in ortona, italy
lies, lies and more lies.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--emo&:roll--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/ROTFL.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='ROTFL.gif' /><!--endemo-->